Skip to main content

Gold Bugs

Although Ambrose Evans-Pritchard is an avowed Europhobe, and will tag on to almost anything he writes a message of doom for the Euro, I found his article in today's Telegraph very interesting.

I am not an economist that argues that the only real store of value is in precious metal, indeed I don't believe it and have often found those who advocate a return to the gold standard to be rather swivel eyed and fanatical.

The root of the disagreement depends on a view on inflation. "Hard fiat money" advocates believe that inflation is always and everywhere a destroyer of wealth. Yet, a certain low level of inflation is a lubricant for economic growth. zero inflation or deflation is almost always a sign of profound economic problems.

Nevertheless the idea that Evans-Pritchard puts forward- that the Dollar collapse could trigger what he calls "competitive devaluations" is a real threat. Essentially his view is the US Fed is seems to be trying to head off recession by exporting the problem overseas, and especially to the Euro zone.

My view is that Ben Bernanke can not pull off the difficult tightrope walk that will avoid a US recession, and by trying to reflate, he will simply inflate, thus leading to a further Dollar fall. I share Evans-Pritchard's view that the risk is ultimately more from uncontrolled inflation, if the the Fed actually adopts the policies that he suggests they will.

Better for the US to take the short run pain of even a deep recession than to destroy the Dollar as the reserve currency. Yet the market for gold suggests that no one believes that this will happen. The rocketing of the price of golds is a measure of the global fear in financial markets- a fear that may persist for some time. However I do not believe that this represents a victory for the hard fiat money advocates and were we to follow their prescriptions then any recession would risk becoming a global depression, with incalculable consequences.


Peter W. said…
A passionate article from AEP, He is anti-EU as you say, but on the few occasions I dealt with him I found him pretty reasonable in terms of the stories he decided to run. If it was rubbish he spiked it.

Munchau in the FT is quite interesting on this topic.
Tristan said…
I am very skeptical of the need for central banks. It seems to me to be another case of people cannot have enough knowledge to make the decisions and a market would be far more efficient.

Having a commodity based currency (be it gold, or something else of (relatively) fixed quantity) is certainly very attractive, I'm not sure how well it would work...
mel said…
Bernanke is doomed either way. Continue to lower the rate and cause disaster for the dollar (create more inflation, artificial commodity price rises, deceasing debt interest from foreign entities, etc), increase the rate and cause a separate but as bad disaster for the economy (spread sub-prime defaults into prime, crashed the market, etc), or hold -- and be called indecisive (which may hurt him and his ego the most).

We've gone too far to go back to a gold standard. The fear now is what you said, Cicero, that the dollar will lose its place as a reserve currency. When such a large amount of the money supply being held in foreign central banks and under mattresses in Quito, Chelyabinsk and Taipei alike, if those re-enter circulation (for simply the purpose of exchanging them for commodities or EUR), it would be a further disater for the US.

US economic and market commentators fail to realise that the bulk of the rise in commodity prices (that includes oil) is chiefly due to the declining dollar. If they gripe about how much the Kuwaitis are earning over a barrel, they need to learn.

Bernanke cannot export this recession out. And frankly, the greatest fear is the collapse of the stock market. Most of the US is already in a recession, if not worse (look at Cleveland and most of what's between California and the East Coast). If the market crashes further, that will dry up capital gains taxation -- and the 5-year carry-over will damage tax coffers for similar years.

For one, New York City will be hurting very badly budget-wise. And that will easily be exported to the City, Frankfurt, and so forth.

No matter what, the Bush-Bernanke recession will spread and it will hurt the UK very badly -- worse than it will hit the Continent.

Perhaps, Cicero, if this is timed well with Gordo calling a vote for next year, everyone not Labour will benefit. I guess I will see you up north next time then!
Anonymous said…

Have you observed the disquieting events in Georgia. Seems Saakshvili is following the well worn path from Democratic opposition Leader to strong man

mel said…
Dear Lepidus, you have sadly read the situation in Georgia incorrectly. The "protests" put on is for an individual that would be deemed "ultra-right" and "extreme hawk" by any standards. Any statements from him and his supporters must be taken with a brick of salt.

Nutty parties all have persecution complexes. Look at the bloody BNP...

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and Brexit are the Pearl Harbor and the Fall of Singapore in Russia's Hybrid war against the West.

In December 1941, Imperial Japan launched a surprise attack on the United States at Pearl Harbor. After the subsequent declaration of war, within three days, the Japanese had sunk the British warships, HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse, and the rapid Japanese attack led to the surrender of Hong Kong on Christmas Day 1941 and the fall of Singapore only two months after Pearl Harbor. These were the opening blows in the long war of the Pacific that cost over 30,000,000 lives and was only ended with the detonations above Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

"History doesn't often repeat itself, but it rhymes" is an aphorism attributed to Mark Twain, and in a way it seems quite appropriate when we survey the current scene. 

In 1941, Imperial Japan, knowing its own weakness, chose a non-conventional form of war, the surprise attack. Since the end of his first Presidential term, Vladimir Putin, knowing Russia's weakness, has also chosen non-conventional ways to promote his domestic powe…

The American National nightmare becomes a global nightmare

It is a basic contention of this blog that Donald J Trump is not fit for office.

A crooked real estate developer with a dubious past and highly questionable finances. he has systematically lied his way into financial or other advantage. His personal qualities include vulgarity, sexual assault allegations and fraudulent statements on almost every subject. 

He lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes.

He has, of course, been under criminal investigation practically since before he took the oath of office. The indictment of some of closest advisers is just the beginning. His track record suggests that in due course there is no action he will not take, whether illegal or unconstitutional in order to derail his own inevitable impeachment and the indictments that must surely follow the successful investigation of Robert Mueller into his connections with Russia.

However, all of that is a matter for the American people. 

It is also a matter for the American people that Trump is cheating…

The rumbling financial markets

Security specialists use a variety of ways to address the risks that they face: and these risk assessments are made in the certain knowledge that the actors in the system hold only incomplete information. Although much mocked at the time, Donald Rumsfeld’s categorization of “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns”, is now generally recognized as a succinct summery of his strategic quandaries.
By contrast, actors in the financial markets have a more sanguine assessment of the risks they deal with: they divide them into two kinds of risk: quantifiable and unquantifiable. Unquantifiable risk is not generally considered, since there is usually no financial profit that can be made except from pure supposition. Therefore for the purposes of the financial markets, any given event is priced relative to its level of probability, that is to say its quantifiable risk. 
Depending on the market, higher levels of risk generally carry higher prices, lower levels generally lower prices. Clearly such an…