Skip to main content

Be careful what you wish for

Many Conservatives were saying to me over the past few months that with a different leader they could see the Liberal Democrats returning to contention in British politics. Indeed many of said that they could easily support the Lib Dems, "if only you had a X as leader instead".

Several have mentioned Nick Clegg or Chris Huhne as being potentially a far greater threat to Cameron than Ming Campbell. Of course they did not think that Ming would leave the leadership so soon- any more than I did.

The media has led a pretty unpleasant campaign to denigrate Ming Campbell as "too old" or "too weak". At Brighton, although the party was quite happy with Ming as its leader, the fact is that in every single one of 74 interviews Ming was asked about his age by the press and broadcast media. In the end, in the face of this extraordinarily heavy fire, the poll ratings of the Liberal Democrats began to be hurt. In the end, as a true and loyal Liberal Democrat, Ming decided to stand down, when it became obvious that the problem of the media was not going to go away.

Now the media is suggesting that this was some kind of brutal party assassination. It was not, it was simply a reflection that the attacks that the media were themselves making on the leader were not going to stop, no matter what, and Ming was unwilling to face what is likely to be another 2 years of this. Having overcome a serious cancer, Ming Campbell did not need these personal and hurtful attacks to continue. So the vile gloating from some quarters-in the press and in other parties-that the Lib Dems are the new "nasty" party is very wide of the mark indeed it is pretty hypocritical.

Now it seems likely that the race for the new leader will be between Chris Huhne and Nick Clegg. Although Nick clearly has the advantage, the fact is that either would be good leaders and would terrify the other parties. Chris is a brilliantly successful businessman and economist, with strong ties to finance. Nick has a track record as a high flying civil servant. Both are cosmopolitan multi-lingual and highly intelligent.

The enemies of the party have now switched tack. Clegg, they say is just "Cameron lite", while Chris Huhne is "the assassin of Ming Campbell".

Nice try guys!

The reality is that with Clegg, you get a real principled Liberal (as opposed to an unprincipled "Liberal Conservative") who happens to be a good communicator as well. With Huhne you get a highly intelligent and forensic debater who understands economics and finance in a way that no one on the other parties' front benches can even aspire to.

Even amongst the Lib Dem front bench which bristles with well rounded, well educated figures, from Dr. Vince Cable, David Laws, and Edward Davey to Professor Webb, and Dr. Evan Harris, these two are exceptional.

Those that looked on the Lib Dems with a certain amount of schadenfreude will now face a serious challenge- whoever take the reins at Cowley Street is going to be a good communicator, with a track record of success and a substantial personal hinterland.

Our opponents may now be crying crocodile tears over the demise of Ming- they will be weeping real tears when the re-energised Liberal Democrats start to bring the battle for freedom firmly back onto the political agenda, and the authoritarian statists of blue and red are forced to explain themselves.


Liberal Polemic said…
A typically excellent post.

I hope our new leader comes out swinging with such accuracy and power.
Anonymous said…
So you're backing Clegg then....

BTW I hope you have recovered your good humour now


Popular posts from this blog

Breaking the Brexit logjam

The fundamental problem of Brexit has not been that the UK voted to leave the European Union. The problem has been the fact that the vote was hijacked by ignorant, grandstanding fools who interpreted the vote as a will to sever all and every link between the UK and the European Union. That was then and is now a catastrophic policy. To default to WTO rules, when any member of the WTO could stop that policy was a recipe for the UK to be held hostage by any state with an act to grind against us. A crash out from the EU, without any structure to cope, was an act of recklessness that should disqualify anyone advocating it from any position of power whatsoever. That is now the most likely option because the Conservative leadership, abetted by the cowardly extremism of Corbyn, neither understood the scale of the crisis, now had any vision of how to tackle it.

Theresa May is a weak and hapless Prime Minster, and her problems started when she failed to realize that there was a compromise that w…

The rumbling financial markets

Security specialists use a variety of ways to address the risks that they face: and these risk assessments are made in the certain knowledge that the actors in the system hold only incomplete information. Although much mocked at the time, Donald Rumsfeld’s categorization of “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns”, is now generally recognized as a succinct summery of his strategic quandaries.
By contrast, actors in the financial markets have a more sanguine assessment of the risks they deal with: they divide them into two kinds of risk: quantifiable and unquantifiable. Unquantifiable risk is not generally considered, since there is usually no financial profit that can be made except from pure supposition. Therefore for the purposes of the financial markets, any given event is priced relative to its level of probability, that is to say its quantifiable risk. 
Depending on the market, higher levels of risk generally carry higher prices, lower levels generally lower prices. Clearly such an…

The American National nightmare becomes a global nightmare

It is a basic contention of this blog that Donald J Trump is not fit for office.

A crooked real estate developer with a dubious past and highly questionable finances. he has systematically lied his way into financial or other advantage. His personal qualities include vulgarity, sexual assault allegations and fraudulent statements on almost every subject. 

He lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes.

He has, of course, been under criminal investigation practically since before he took the oath of office. The indictment of some of closest advisers is just the beginning. His track record suggests that in due course there is no action he will not take, whether illegal or unconstitutional in order to derail his own inevitable impeachment and the indictments that must surely follow the successful investigation of Robert Mueller into his connections with Russia.

However, all of that is a matter for the American people. 

It is also a matter for the American people that Trump is cheating…