Skip to main content

Summertime and the blogging ain't easy

In both London and in Tallinn the good summer weather is making bloggers - including this one- rather lazy. Iain Dale is taking a 10 day break, and activity across the blogosphere is declining in the summer heat.

In part this reflects the simple exhaustion after the election campaign and the long phony war that preceded it. It also reflects, I think, a new evolution in the way blogs are being written. The advent of Twitter has reduced a blog to a tweet, and the significant amount of work that a blog involves is also causing even long standing and well known bloggers to reappraise what they do.

This blog is no different.

I have always set out to write about subjects to which I have some particular insight. I try to write in more detail- time permitting- than I see in the mainstream press. Unfortunately the side effect is that the blog is pretty wordy- and combined with poor editing- it is clear that I do not hit the kind of audience that the mega-blogs like Political Betting or Iain Dale can do. Nevertheless the readership of this blog has been steadily growing, and until I took a rest a few weeks ago, I was getting record readership.

Part of the hiatus of blogging has been the result of my own doubts about the role of the Liberal Democrats in the new political world of the coalition. I feared- indeed still fear- that the leadership of the party was in danger of selling the tradition of Liberalism far too cheaply and that instead of a more Liberal political system, what may emerge over the next two years is a Conservativism that is revived without the necessary Liberalism that the UK still needs to rediscover.

The result of the general election was a double edged sword for the Liberal Democrats, and there is no use pretending that the challenges that we face as a political party will be anything except pretty testing. The need to enact political reform is critical, not just to the future of the country, but also to the survival of the Liberal Democrats as an independent political force.

The party will certainly pay a price for entering the coalition- but that price may be worth paying if the result is that the constitution can be improved and the role of the state can be both reduced and yet made more efficient. Certainly the crisis that New Labour left us with should remind us that the misguided instincts of Socialism wedded to unprincipled pragmatism leads to nothing but economic and political disaster. Labour needs to be finished as a political force, yet my fear is that the alliance the Liberal Democrats have forged with the Conservatives may allow the zombie ideology of warmed-over Socialism to continue as a political force for another generation.

So, as the pleasant summer heat continues, Liberal Democrats are spending their time considering the future and the best way to promote the key principles that Liberalism represents. Blogging may remain sparse, but the debate that is going on quietly inside the party is absolutely critical. The Party conference in September will see uncomfortable questions being asked. Although the party is pretty united, there is now a real sense that we will need to work harder than ever to convince the voters of the value of Liberal principles.

That is a debate where this blog intends to take an active role- so after the long hiatus, I can now return to the fight.

Comments

Blackacre said…
Good.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...