Skip to main content

Summertime and the blogging ain't easy

In both London and in Tallinn the good summer weather is making bloggers - including this one- rather lazy. Iain Dale is taking a 10 day break, and activity across the blogosphere is declining in the summer heat.

In part this reflects the simple exhaustion after the election campaign and the long phony war that preceded it. It also reflects, I think, a new evolution in the way blogs are being written. The advent of Twitter has reduced a blog to a tweet, and the significant amount of work that a blog involves is also causing even long standing and well known bloggers to reappraise what they do.

This blog is no different.

I have always set out to write about subjects to which I have some particular insight. I try to write in more detail- time permitting- than I see in the mainstream press. Unfortunately the side effect is that the blog is pretty wordy- and combined with poor editing- it is clear that I do not hit the kind of audience that the mega-blogs like Political Betting or Iain Dale can do. Nevertheless the readership of this blog has been steadily growing, and until I took a rest a few weeks ago, I was getting record readership.

Part of the hiatus of blogging has been the result of my own doubts about the role of the Liberal Democrats in the new political world of the coalition. I feared- indeed still fear- that the leadership of the party was in danger of selling the tradition of Liberalism far too cheaply and that instead of a more Liberal political system, what may emerge over the next two years is a Conservativism that is revived without the necessary Liberalism that the UK still needs to rediscover.

The result of the general election was a double edged sword for the Liberal Democrats, and there is no use pretending that the challenges that we face as a political party will be anything except pretty testing. The need to enact political reform is critical, not just to the future of the country, but also to the survival of the Liberal Democrats as an independent political force.

The party will certainly pay a price for entering the coalition- but that price may be worth paying if the result is that the constitution can be improved and the role of the state can be both reduced and yet made more efficient. Certainly the crisis that New Labour left us with should remind us that the misguided instincts of Socialism wedded to unprincipled pragmatism leads to nothing but economic and political disaster. Labour needs to be finished as a political force, yet my fear is that the alliance the Liberal Democrats have forged with the Conservatives may allow the zombie ideology of warmed-over Socialism to continue as a political force for another generation.

So, as the pleasant summer heat continues, Liberal Democrats are spending their time considering the future and the best way to promote the key principles that Liberalism represents. Blogging may remain sparse, but the debate that is going on quietly inside the party is absolutely critical. The Party conference in September will see uncomfortable questions being asked. Although the party is pretty united, there is now a real sense that we will need to work harder than ever to convince the voters of the value of Liberal principles.

That is a debate where this blog intends to take an active role- so after the long hiatus, I can now return to the fight.

Comments

Blackacre said…
Good.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo