Skip to main content

Poland chooses more wisely

After six European countries in 10 days, I return to the white nights of Tallinn ready to face a large pile of work. However, I must now catch up with the writing of this blog which has been much neglected of late.

I spent about a week in Hungary, spending time with several American friends, then a quick trip to Estonia's southern neighbours: Latvia and Lithuania and then a trip to Warsaw. While in Warsaw I witnessed with friends (and several relatives of the new President) the election of Bronislaw Komerowski as the fourth President of the Polish III Republic.

The second round of the election was a straight choice between Komerowski and the twin brother of the late President, killed in the Smolensk air disaster, Lech Kaczynski. Jaroslaw "Jarek" Kaczynski has previously served as Prime Minister, when his brother first became President. Jarek Kaczynski is- to say the least- a controversial figure. A profound Social Conservative, he is close to the most reactionary figures in the Catholic church, several of whom chose to denounce -the no less Catholic- Mr. Komerowski from the pulpit. Mr. Kaczynski's follows included some of the most backwoods elements of Polish Society who seem determined to offend their opponents for the slightest deviation from their perceived true path of Nationalist, Catholic Conservative and defensive Polish identity.

Mr Komerowski, on the other hand, as a member of the ruling Civic Platform, is far closer to the true spirit of the Solidarity movement which opposed Communism in the 1980s- indeed he was imprisoned under Communism twice. However his vision for Poland is far more open and much more tolerant- unlike either of the Kaczynski brothers, he has spoken approvingly of secular policies, such as greater freedom for homosexuals, for example. Almost all of the leaders of the Solidarity Movement, including Lech Walesa and Tadeusz Mazowiecki have supported Mr. Komerowski's campaign.

Had Mr. Kaczynski been elected there would have been a return the the hostilities of the Kulturkampf that was taking place between the late President Kaczynski and the government of the centrist Civic Platform under Prime Minister Donald Tusk. Indeed Jarek Kaczynski might have been even more divisive than his relatively calmer brother.

This is not to say that the Tusk government may now rest on its laurels.

The vote for Mr. Kaczynski- no doubt influenced by sympathy for him after the death of his brother- was nonetheless still impressive. Despite the occasionally almost paranoid tone of the two brothers in the last few years in both domestic and international policy, which seemed set to mark the certain defeat of President Lech Kaczynksi in the scheduled election in October, the margin of victory for the Civic Platform was very narrow. Mr. Kaczynski seemed revivified in the campaign, and some subtle changes of tone helped prevent the dramatic defeat that once seemed likely for him and his party.

Nevertheless, despite the economic success of the Tusk government, the battles of the Kulturkampf remain as shrill as ever. The power of Polonia Semper Fidelis remains strong, together with the almost unchallenged role of the church. Any attempt to challenge the deeply conservative elements in the Roman Catholic church must be handled carefully: despite the full throated opposition that several Conservative priests have voiced, the government continues to give their views and exaggerated respect.

In one year's time, the Parliamentary elections will be held, and the backwoodsmen will be back in that campaign as strong as ever. It is time for the Prime Minister to push forward a more radical economic policy, which he may now do without the sniping of a President Kaczynski.

As one of Mr. Komerowski's relatives said at the election night party: Poland usually does do the right thing, but generally only when all the other alternatives have been exhausted.

Comments

pepe said…
It's also worth to say that two( one officially, one unofficially) leaders of Polish Conservative Liberalism front(http://partiawip.pl/, http://www.upr.org.pl/), gave their support for Mr. Kaczyński.
"economic success of the Tusk government" is a myth, but it's issue for separate post.
here is Polish government debt: http://www.flickr.com/photos/51796428@N05/4770978988/
Late President, L. Kaczyński used 17vetos by 4years, L. Walesa made 22v/5y, A. Kwasniewski 35v/10y( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqihgQS-Vro )/watch?v=CqihgQS-Vro ).
I live in Poland( and have no friends in Civic Platform ;) )

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo