Skip to main content

Nick Clegg and Economic Liberalism

Slowly, slowly we progress: Nick Clegg's speech on the economy, while I was away in Estonia, was reasonably trenchant, especially in claiming the mantle of Economic Liberalism.

I think the stuff on the Banking system was very much to the point:

"The truth is, the British banking industry is cosseted and closed. It is not truly competitive.
For years it’s been almost impossible to get a new banking licence. New banks are usually just a subsidiary of existing banks.
And the Northern Rock episode has demonstrated that it’s also nearly impossible to stop being a bank.
The government and regulators are too afraid to let a bank fail.
Unless we lower the barriers to market entry and market exit, we will not have a truly competitive banking industry that can eradicate the poor service and high charges consumers currently face.
To make true competition possible without jeopardising customers, deposit protection needs to be beefed up, and widely publicised, to protect individuals’ deposits and give them confidence in the banking system.
Deposit protection should be peer-funded by the banks themselves, as in the US.
And then we need to look at making banking truly competitive again: allowing new entrants in more easily and allowing failure too.
Whatever happens, the Bank of England also needs – at a senior level – to secure greater expertise in relation to the workings of the financial markets."

This is good, and the other thing that impressed me was that the thread of the speech was very clear. He set out the key principles and then showed how policies flowed from them. The key ideas: open markets, competition, are all reflected in the specific policy agenda that he put forward.

Nick Clegg is increasingly impressive: he has a clear agenda and a clarity of thought which marks out a definate direction. At a time when Gordon Brown has broken all his golden rules, and when Cameron seems to go out of his way to obfuscate and hide whatever his political agenda actually is, such directness is particularly refreshing, I think.

Comments

Newmania said…
Yes I`ve seen Nick Clegg speaking a couple of times and he does not frighten to horses, in fact he would be at home in the moderate wing of the Conservative Party were in not for his utter disdain for the people of this country and their wish to remain a nation. That is where we part company and sadly as anything he suggest is bound to involve some awfully clever reason for us to cease to be a country one is bound to be cynical.
I must say if Insurance is anything to go by the flood of EU licensed competition has been a disaster and utterly misunderstood , of course , by the regulatory bodies supposedly in charge and hidden from the consumer .
The problem with Nick Clegg is that he is not representative of the Liberal party who had to hold their noses to elect him and he cannot take them into coalition of any sort except with Labour. I saw this clearly in Islington and I see it again now in Lewes .
.I `m staggered that the Lib Dems have allowed themselves to get into this position if they were not second class socialists I could live with a Conservative Liberal administration which in many ways is the natural majority view of England certainly

As ever it all comes down to Europe , I think it would help here if the pros stopped lying and started persuading .I think such a debate would be lost but it would draw some of the bitterness out of it , have you seen what they are doing in Parliament now and this is after sayig we would not debate the matter because there was going to be a referendum !!


I may have veered off course there a bit
Cicero said…
Well, I could blog about Puffins in St Kilda, and you would still blame the shortage of sand eels on "Europe" :-)

Of course I totally reject your allegation that Lib Dems want to destroy the UK. I think that the blustering, obessional Europhobia that Many Tories have is bordering on the downright weird.
Newmania said…
I see 16 Lib MPs are rebelling over the Party edict to save Brown and it could be there will be a referendum after all
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo