Skip to main content

Market Solutions

As the credit market continues to tighten, it is clear that major ramifications are already underway. Despite the fact that too many political figures insist that they can do a better job by regulating, in fact the market has a habit of being able to fix its own problems.

Ferrovial, who bought BAA a year and a half ago, are now finding their large debt burden hitting their profits severely.

However, there is a solution: they can simply sell assets.

From the point of view of the consumer, this would be good news. The lack of competition has led to inefficient use of the airports around London. The poor transport links to Heathrow has allowed the BAA owned Heathrow Express to become the most expensive train ride per mile in the world, yet passengers transferring between different London Airports must do so by either coming into London by train, or taking a bus or taxi directly- there is no direct train link.

Breaking up the monopoly would force competition and help to address the costs and the access problems. The invisible hand strikes again!

Comments

Jock Coats said…
Yeah - but they should also have to pay for the airspace they use (LVT). That would concentrate minds a bit I expect!
Newmania said…
I like this post and I sort of like the previous one in spirit at least .


Sadly you are a member of Party who want to raise taxes , expand the state and export decision making to unaccountable foreigners.Furthermore it is well known that you will support Brown and thereby inflict more of the crushing authotitarian state we are already suffering under. I think you want to be economically free market and socially Liberal.
You would be far more at home in the Conservative party.

I know plenty of Liberals and they have are all," Something -must -be -done" people .Always will be .
Cicero said…
Jock- yes it would- and LVT as you know is something I support.

Newmania- I have been a member of the Liberals and the Liberal Democrats since 1979. As you may have guessed one member of my family is a Lib Dem MP, and I am friendly with several others. When I put forward my ideas, I am not a voice crying in the wilderness, I would say that I am in the mainstream of my party. I am socially and economically Liberal- that is why I am politically a Liberal Democrat.
Newmania said…
You must know most of the Parliamentary Party then :)



Then the entire Party could join the Conservative Party then which easily accomodates such views and tolerates difference with good humour anyway.Bits and bobs aside its about the role and scope of the state and if you are on our side you cannot , as Clegg has said he may , support Brown.

Such a position is a farce
Cicero said…
Nice try! However, Tory Love bombs don't alter the fact that the socially conservative element is top dog: Cornerstone alone off sets the few Liberal individuals amongst the Consevatives...

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...