Skip to main content

Rogue polls and Vogue Pols

The endless merry-go-round of opinion polls is not something I ever get too thrilled about- leaving it to the more anorak-y commentators on Politicalbetting.com.

In particular the gyrations of YouGov do not give me much confidence as to their methodology. The latest YouGov showing Gordon Brown 11% ahead of the Tories, with the Lib Dems, despite a good conference, losing 3% strikes me as more than usually strange. Yet, in the vague atmosphere of election fever, such a strong lead is creating a media frenzy.

For what it is worth, I am not convinced that an election over half term (October 25th) or even in early November is a particularly likely option. Rather, it seems to me that stoking the election speculation achieves two goals: one it leaves the Conservatives on the back foot, and secondly since the lead story in the media is all about a potential election, it eliminates some more difficult questions on things like Northern Rock, which only the most informed journalists even understand the implications. While I am sure that Labour do have a couple of nasty surprises with which to sabotage the increasingly hapless David Cameron- such as rumours of possible defections- I am unconvinced that Brown would go at a time which is so tricky logistically.

In fact, judging by the Comments from Norman Tebbit on David Cameron, it may still be the case that the young Conservative leader has still not eaten his full ration of crow. The open contempt of Thatcherites for the regime of the toffs has now become entirely unconcealed loathing. The visit of Margaret Thatcher to 10 Downing St was in many ways extraordinary- Norman Tebbit's warm words about Gordon Brown merely underline the increasingly shaky control that Cameron has within his own party. It is hard to avoid the idea that, as with William Hague, the Conservatives have looked for youth but found a lack of experience. It seems almost too emblematic that the pin-up boy for Cameron's Conservatives, Adam Rickett, is facing shoplifting charges in New Zealand.

I think there is the serious risk that the forthcoming election- whenever it is held- would be the last for the Conservatives in their current form. Certainly in Scotland, the Conservatives show no signs of emerging from their coma.

The challenge for Liberal Democrats is to demonstrate the practicality of our policies: why they actually deliver what the Daily Mail populists only promise in the criminal justice system, why they will strengthen our economy and why they will deliver a fairer and more open society.

The unlikely alliance of New Labour and Old Thatcherite only serves to underline our contention that we are dealing with an authoritarian and reactionary consensus amongst the other two parties. The more libertarian, more open and freer principles of Liberalism mark out the battle lines, and whenever the election is called it is on those key issues that we can fight our ground.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Regime of toffs eh? I must have missed it surveying those "horny handed sons of toil" on the Lib Dem benches. I'd almost forgotten what Chris Huhne used to drive round the City in. If you wish to get derogatory in that manner Consul perhaps you would care to out your own House in order first. Cameron has done more to promote diversity in the Tory benches than your Party with a feeble offer of more cash to helpful Local Associations.

So Norman Tebbit is mouthing off. Big deal. Lord Rodgers sank his dentures into Ming. He's from the same era. If you take one seriously you must take both. I do neither.

As it happens I agree with your election timing analysis. Just a pity you had t resort to the sort of tabloid stuff, you often moan about from the Sun when directed against your Party



Lepidus
Cicero said…
Well, actually Lepidus I was really only paraphrasing what Tebbit was saying, so the criticism is from your own side. Mind you I do think that Cameron has created something of an old school clique, and it is not just Tebbit who seems a bit peeved about that. I have always felt that Tebbit has a pretty one-eyed view of the world, but when even the Uber-Thatcherite prefers Brown to DC, then all is clearly not too rosy. Especially when there is more than mutterings from elsewhere: Ancram, Portillo and so on.
Anonymous said…
hadn't seem the Ricketty thing.....
.......not a good time for former pupils of Sedbergh School.....Northern Rock CE is OS!

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...