Skip to main content

Gordon Brown: the seeds of his own downfall

As the reverberations from the Northern Rock debacle continue to echo, and as the evidence grows for a major fallout from the growing US Dollar crisis- one major casualty emerges: the credibility of the independence of the British Central Bank.

The first act of Brown as Chancellor was to grant the Bank of England independence. one of the first acts of Brown as Prime Minister is to demonstrate that the Bank is in fact not independent at all.

The political fallout of Northern Rock placed the Governor, Mervyn King under some pressure to resign, but even more pressure to change his policy of limiting support to lenders who get into trouble. The Governor's long held view is that to provide generous credit terms to banks that get into trouble would eliminate moral hazard and therefore encourage banks to take even greater risks.

More importantly still, the wash of extra money would add to inflationary pressures in the economy.

None of this seems to have counted with the UK Treasury- they have insisted on an all encompassing state guarantee for the Northern Rock depositors- such that remain- and have railroaded the Bank of England into giving their consent.

The next crisis will doubtless leave the independence of the Central Bank looking even more threadbare. In the meantime, despite the economic success claimed by Gordon Brown, the fact is that British interest rates have continued to be consistently higher than our European counterparts in the Eurozone. In the past few years the Sterling premium has allowed British financial system to take advantage of the "carry trade", and borrow in cheaper currencies now, however, even the premium has not been enough, and liquidity in Sterling has vanished.

In such a crisis, it is critical that the Central Bank has credibility. Unfortunately, by undermining this credibility, Gordon Brown has created a moral hazard for his own government: it is now expected that he would underwrite large parts of the banking system, and if he does not, then even greater volatility could result. Meanwhile, there are substantial inflationary pressures in the economy that imply a necessary brake on lending.

As the growing fallout of the Dollar crisis shows: there is now a real risk that the UK could join the US on the road to 1970's style "stag-flation". As in the early 1970s, the US is headed by a discredited administration, deeply embroiled in a disastrous land war in Asia. The difference now is that the US is not the world's creditor, but its debtor. The UK, as one of the largest investors in US business, has already lost billions as the value of those investments, measured in Sterling, diminishes. Yet our competitiveness versus the rest of the EU is also falling, as the supply of cheap and high quality labour from Central Europe now dries up.

These inflationary risks remain, yet the risk of a slowdown, based on falling house prices, has now risen dramatically. Brown may have already laid the seeds of his own downfall, by reversing the one single policy that Liberal Democrats could support whole-heartedly: an independent Central Bank.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm no Labour supporter but didn't Mervyn King say `no` to a question to him asking whether political pressure was put on him.
Tristan said…
ah, but what about political pressure to deny political pressure?
Martin Veart said…
I'm rather torn on Mervyn King. Sure, he got a hard time in front of the select committee but he did make the valid point that his hands were tied by recent legislation. Before it was introduced the Bank of England could have provided behind the scenes help to Northern Rock without public knowledge; thus preventing the understandable panic that followed when, because the Bank's hands were tied, the loan facility was made public.

I don't think the personnel at the Bank of England conducted themselves with any great success in the recent crisis but it is clear to me that the main fault is not the individuals but rather the current system.

Remind me who put that in place....? Ah yes. Gordon Brown.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...