Skip to main content

Asian Conundrum

30 years ago today the Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (then Hua Guofeng) announced the arrest of the Gang of Four.

The arrest of these most senior figures in the Chinese Communist Party (including the widow of Chairman Mao Zhedong himself) is popularly thought of as being the end of the bloody turmoil of Mao's catastrophic "cultural revolution".

Certainly the installation of Deng Xiaoping as the new moderate and reforming leader in 1977 turned the People's Republic of China into something much less murderous.

China remains under the control of Communists that have not repudiated Mao, even while they now acknowledge "mistakes". "Mistakes"? No one knows how many people died during the famines and massacres of the cultural revolution nor the equally catastrophic "Great Leap Forward" that proceeded it. The death toll is certainly tens of millions; it may even be over a hundred million- a number that is higher than Hitler and Stalin combined.

Despite the welcome moves to greater liberalism, China remains a tyranny and a highly unpredictable one at that. It is certainly significant that the PRC has criticized North Korea for their presumed nuclear test. Yet criticism is not enough. The wretched regime of Kim Jong-il is dependent on China- a fellow Communist state and a determined move by Beijing could remove this dangerous factor in East Asia for good.

Given the fact that the United States simply does not have the resources to remove Kim by force, it could prove a substantial opportunity for China. By removing the lunatic regime in Pyongyang China has the opportunity to offer reunification to Korea and to turn the united country into a neutral zone- removing American troops for the peninsula. If, of course, the Mandarins of the Forbidden city can accept the collapse of a Communist state.

It would certainly be a test of whether the Chinese state interest remains led by ideology or by power. From the point of view of Western interests, it is a moot but significant point- for the problems of Taiwan, the Spratly islands and the continuing oppression of Tibet remained us that we must still tread lightly.

The arrest of the gang of four started a process that is still not complete.

Zhou Enlai was once asked what he thought were the lessons of the French revolution :

"Its too soon to tell"

The same applies to the phenomenon of modern China since 1976- the great conundrum.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I suggest you read "The Third World War" by BBC correspondent Humphrey Hawksley. It is a fascinating tale on how China is the true leader of the pariah states, how it brought nuclear technology to both Pakistan and North Korea, and how both will lead China to inevitably conflict with the civilised world.
Cicero said…
Well, it is a novel so perhaps a little "sensationalised", but clearly China is not an ally of the West.
James said…
I read that book too hoping for a heavy weight discussion of international relations in the Far East. I'm afraid though that it bears all the hallmarks of the worst of British journalistic cliches and received wisdom about virtually every nation state involved - somewhat akin to Freddie Forsyth novel. Perhaps the kindest thing that can be said about it is that it's a highly 'imaginative' work.
Anonymous said…
It would certainly be an achievement on the world stage as seen through Western eyes, but it may look like jettisoning a brother state to the general public to which the Chinese regime is more repsonsive than is usually presumed (the primal fear of any Chinese government being instability let alone upheaval). Also, China would become the refuge for thousands of regime roadsters and would possibly have to take more responsibility than it can shoulder in respect of the sure to collapse North Korean economy and society. Politically it would be unacceptable to surrender the initiative and leave the mess to South Korea to sort out. Yet, South Korea's official line is that a German style unification could not be financed. Life is not as easy as it seems between the covers of a novel...
Cicero said…
Yes of course the ROK does not want a German style collapse of the North- which is why they have been so eager to promote the sunshine policy- but the fact is that the DPRK is now extremely unstable. The question for China is at what point MUST it intervene. That point might be surprisingly soon.
Anonymous said…
http://www.voima.fi/content/view/full/1867

Persons from internal famous (in Finland) band members of Ultra Bra, with new temporary name Työryhä created song dedicated to memory of Anna Politkovskaya.


Download and share the News!

~~~~#~~~~~#~~~~~#~~~~#~~~~
Die Weiße Rose, Finland
- Alles liebe est kostbar!

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...