Skip to main content

Further dispatches from Perth

The Scottish Liberal Democrats conference continues over the weekend, though unfortunately I will have to leave after lunch today: barely halfway through the gathering. It means, that despite seeing so many of my very old friends, inevitably I will miss several- and of course the most convivial gathering, in the shape of the conference dinner.

As I get ready to leave, I reflect upon the current state of party politics. Relative to our immediate past, I find the Scottish Liberal Democrats in very rude health, yet I reflect that all political parties are simply shadows of what they once were. The network of Liberal clubs, Conservative clubs and Working Men's clubs which provided a social reinforcement to political activism are now long gone- transmuted into just another way to consume alcohol. The physical infrastructure of committee rooms, libraries and so on that the Victorian philanthropists bequeathed, are also now much diminished. Politics, as a mass social activity, appears to have gone the way of religion: while many may profess to be believers the fact is that many if not most are more heretic than orthodox and political observance is limited to the occasional visit to the ballot box, the political equivalent of a Christmas midnight mass.

The latest political initiative to reinvigorate the political system is a rather oxymoronic concept "organised independents", Sir Paul Judge, a former Conservative donor, has switched his funding to a new group called "the Jury Team", which will campaign to get more non party politicians elected. I doubt it will work- where local "independent" groups exist, they tend to behave in exactly the same way as the national parties. They campaign as "holier than thou", but they almost always fail to achieve their aspirations- not because of party political competition very often, but because of the pressures of their own contradictions.

That is not to say that all is rosy in the party political garden: far from it. However in the end, perhaps the shortcomings of politics could be solved were there a greater political engagement by wider society. Actually, of course, millions of people ARE political engaged, they are members of the National Trust, the give to the RSPCA or Shelter or any one of thousands of other charities. They are school governors, they create campaigns to protect their local area. Yet, for the vast majority of these people, the current menu of electable parties is simply unappealing. For me as for millions of others, there is a deep frustration that politics in their area does not represent what they believe in.

In my opinion the House of Commons is the last bastion of an anti-competitive closed market. In the largest majority of seats, there is no competition- and we should hardly be surprised that turnout in those seats is sometimes barely above 50%.

At their root, Scottish Liberal Democrats believe in a free and fair electoral system, and that is our answer to those who demand more independents- a free market in politics will ultimately lead to a a more diverse political system.

I am happy to be back in Scotland, especially in Perth, which seems to represent the better part of our solid Victorian heritage- it remains a wealthy and stable community. My party here is optimistic about their electoral future, and certainly in the face of Labour decline and SNP dithering they have every reason to be feeling positive. As for me, I reluctantly return South, but with a determination to be back soon.

Comments

Unknown said…
Thanks for your updates from Perth - wish I could have been there to see you. Hope to see you back in Scotland soon.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...