Skip to main content

An end to the Night-Mayor

Last night was the first of doubtless many debates between the candidates for Mayor of London.

To be honest I have been in a gentle kind of despair about the idea of Ken Livingstone, who I believe to be incompetent, doctrinaire and rather crooked, holding on to his job.

Certainly, the idea of Boris Johnson- the clownish, gaffe prone Conservative candidate- replacing Livingstone is really not appealing at all. I think I prefer the dubious crook to the embarrassing clown.

However, one candidate last night actually did come over as a sound and sensible figure. Brian Paddick was a guy who one can imagine dealing with - God forbid- a major terrorist incident. He also has interesting ideas about how to tackle the mess in transport and already knows far more than other two do about Policing.

He is clearly thoughtful and intelligent.

Between the posturing of the two gargoyles -Ken and Boris- Brian Paddick looks extremely good. If Boris's campaign implodes , as it easily might, and the rumours of Mayoral shenanigans prove to be more than rumours, then Brian Paddick could even end up as the winner of the contest.

I certainly hope so- I believe him to be much better qualified than the other two.

Comments

Newmania said…
I think I prefer the dubious crook to the embarrassing clown.

You prefer a bullying collectivist far left City hall operator who ferments racial tension at every turn to Boris ? Boris is , of course extremely Libertarian, green and the fact he is a brilliant and amusing writer as well is a good thing .
I am saddened to see this miserabilist Brownite cant Thinking on the earlier thread it occurred to me that if the way you represented your Party was true then they could happily with the Conservatives against the statist Brown( and the even worse Livingstone).


Cat in hells chance I see and this is exactly the sort of lie that must be nailed if Libertal candidates are going to stand without telling the voters they intend simply to prop up Brown.
I do not believe it would be possible for Nick Clegg to get his Party to deal with Cameron . The Liberals I knew were from Islignton and they were marginaly less socilaist than Margaret Hodge but no more


I would like to proved wrong but we have to know .I will be actuive in the campaign to get Norman Baker out here and it is excatly this problem that we will be drawing atention to

Vote Baker get Brown. If there are going to be lies up until Polling day then we will at least be in a position to say so.
Cicero said…
Fortunaely for the voters of Lewes, Reducing your campaign to furious ad hominem attacks will reveal a confused and arrogant mind. Norman Baker has been one of the most trenchant ctitics of the Blai-Brown regime, so your view that he is somehow a crypto socialist is transparently rubbish.
Newmania said…
Oh grow up
Cicero said…
Newmania, I am rather afraid that your ramblingly incoherrent nonsense speaks for itself. I am perfectly happy to debate ideas, but will not tolerate unpleasant ad hominem attacks and insults. You have worked yourself up into an entirely unjustified fury against Norman Baker, and by extension the whole of the Liberal Democrats. When you do that you come across as very much one of the green ink brigade, and the fact that you local newspaper chose to publish your absurd little letter reflects the fact that know that such extreme oppinions will create a reaction. I think your "Mania" name is well taken. It does not get our country any further, even if you feel a trivial little bit better.

I must make a donation to Norman's campaign fund.
Tristan said…
I'm not sure who I prefer, clown or crook?

Sometimes I swing towards clown, on the basis that hopefully he won't actually do that much interfering...

Brian Paddick has impressed me considerably though. I think he can definitely be counted as a contender (unlike Simon Hughes last time round who singularly failed to impress).
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo