Skip to main content

The Curse of Blog

Well, a rather smug and arrogant British politician is forced out of ministerial office following the referral of his financial dealings to the Metropolitan Police- I see that Guido Fawkes is happily dancing on Peter Hain's political grave, and indeed claiming his political scalp as the first victory of the insurgent blogosphere over the political class, and indeed the "old media".

The blogosphere redux ?

Well, I am not too sure about that.

The medium has changed quite a bit from the heady days of last year when a blog was being created every blink of an eye.

Despite the supposed triumph of the transforming technology, I see that several very good blogs, like InnerWest, seem to have passed beyond, and even A Liberal goes a Long Way- a former Lib Dem blog of the year- now seems to have dropped out. Newmania, for the more rabid Tories, also seems to have disappeared too.

Sure, there is a limit to what a given individual feels like telling the world. More the point, perhaps it is fair to say that people are also recognising the limits of blogs. They do not change the world, they may not be very influential, they are merely a medium.

Though Guido may feel triumphant, the fact is, that probably 98% of the UK has probably never heard of him. Despite the passion and anger that many bloggers seem to be holding back with extreme difficulty (obviously except Devil's Kitchen who has never knowingly held back anything) the fact is that the audiences are still pretty small. The attention that 18 Doughty St tried to attract for its ideas of blogging television were brave, but at a time when BBC Three is now becoming a webcast TV station it seems to me that in the end, this is television, with television economics, rather than the very low barriers to entry that characterised the original blogosphere. Although perhaps things like Youtube have influenced TV economics, in the end blogs are a different animal. The fact is that most bloggers generally do not have the perfect face for television, and the more rabid opinions expressed look far more acceptable as the written word than they would being spoken.

Of course, there are the superblogs: Iain Dale, Guido Fawkes, et al, and there are also the platform blogs, like Comment is Free and, and there is a long tail of others which are not particularly widely read. Some are interesting, some are humorous, some are thoughtful, some-probably including this blog, are a bit hit and miss. I often say that I write about five good blogs a month- yet in order to maintain any kind of traffic, I still have to write at least around twenty a month. A good columnist with a national newspaper is probably more readable, since they can hone their pieces a bit more than I have time for.

However, despite the limits of blogging, in the two and a half years or so since I took up this blog I have now reached the grand total of just over 50,000 page loads, with about 20,000 individual readers. These have been largely British and American, but I also have regular readers around the world: in Estonia, Zambia, New Zealand, Georgia, and so on. A few are people I know personally, many more are not. I see from my stats a pool of about a thousand regular readers. I am regularly nominated as a good Liberal Democrat blogger, although Jonathan Calder frankly is usually both more amusing and more eclectic than I am.

This blog continues to return to certain themes: usually political, and is focused upon the general theme of political freedom and choice. The ideology of Liberalism is also applicable, I believe, in foreign policy, and I clearly see threats emerging from such powers as Russia.

Given the rather specialist nature of this blog and the rather, shall we say "individualistic" character of its author, I have actually been quite surprised by the size of readership that it attracts- several hundred people a day are now reading what a friend described as "the stuff you tend to say when we are in the pub". Not a super blog, but I hope a blog which gives people a point of view and perhaps provokes some ideas. It seems to fill a modest need, so I shall try to stick with it for a bit.


Newmania said…
Rabies ?
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
blog said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and Brexit are the Pearl Harbor and the Fall of Singapore in Russia's Hybrid war against the West.

In December 1941, Imperial Japan launched a surprise attack on the United States at Pearl Harbor. After the subsequent declaration of war, within three days, the Japanese had sunk the British warships, HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse, and the rapid Japanese attack led to the surrender of Hong Kong on Christmas Day 1941 and the fall of Singapore only two months after Pearl Harbor. These were the opening blows in the long war of the Pacific that cost over 30,000,000 lives and was only ended with the detonations above Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

"History doesn't often repeat itself, but it rhymes" is an aphorism attributed to Mark Twain, and in a way it seems quite appropriate when we survey the current scene. 

In 1941, Imperial Japan, knowing its own weakness, chose a non-conventional form of war, the surprise attack. Since the end of his first Presidential term, Vladimir Putin, knowing Russia's weakness, has also chosen non-conventional ways to promote his domestic powe…

The American National nightmare becomes a global nightmare

It is a basic contention of this blog that Donald J Trump is not fit for office.

A crooked real estate developer with a dubious past and highly questionable finances. he has systematically lied his way into financial or other advantage. His personal qualities include vulgarity, sexual assault allegations and fraudulent statements on almost every subject. 

He lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes.

He has, of course, been under criminal investigation practically since before he took the oath of office. The indictment of some of closest advisers is just the beginning. His track record suggests that in due course there is no action he will not take, whether illegal or unconstitutional in order to derail his own inevitable impeachment and the indictments that must surely follow the successful investigation of Robert Mueller into his connections with Russia.

However, all of that is a matter for the American people. 

It is also a matter for the American people that Trump is cheating…

In praise of off-shore tax havens

The last few years has seen a spate of "scandals" about the use of off-shore tax havens. The hacking and subsequent leaking of data about who does and does not hold assets in off-shore jurisdictions has become an old perennial in the British press, rather like the "COLD weather happens in winter and QUITE HOT weather happens in summer", whose alarmist capital letter laced headlines are such a lazy part of contemporary "journalism". 

The increasing sophistication of the hackers, whether Russian-inspired or not, has resulted in a steady trickle of information becoming a torrent. After the relatively filleted release of data in the so-called "Panama Papers", the data release of the "Paradise Papers" is even larger.  Of course, just natural curiosity dictates that the off-shore ownership, or even just "ownership", of assets is of general public interest.  Celebrities, from the Royal family to the cast of Mrs Brown's Boys, are …