Skip to main content

A blow upon a bruise

My heart sinks as the distressing predictability of the Putin regime shows up yet again.

On November 23rd 2006 Alexander Litvinenko- a Russian defector, but a British Citizen- died in a London hospital. It transpired that he had been poisoned with Polonium 210, with a radioactive signature of Russian origin. Over the course of the past five months the Police investigation has discovered evidence that directly links a Russian intelligence operative, Andrei Lugovoi, to the administration of the poison in a cup of tea served at the Millennium hotel, Grosvenor Square. Today, the Director of Public Prosecutions has decided that the evidence is such that Andrei Lugovoi may be charged with murder and his case sent for trial. As a Russian citizen residing in Moscow, the DPP will request the Russian authorities to extradite the indicted man to face trial.

The initial response of the Russian authorities is to refuse this entirely legitimate request.

Furthermore, on the same day, the Russian Environmental Agency has announced that they have found irregularities in the production sites of BP-TNK, the largest British investment in the Russian Federation. In the past when such declarations have been made, it has begun a process that squeezes out the international partner. In other words, the Russians are now putting the squeeze on BP, as a punishment for a Russian citizen being indicted for the crime of murder.

The breathtakingly crude link points out the fact that Lugovoi may well have been ordered to commit a murder by the Russian government itself. In which case, the regime in Moscow is an accomplice to murder. In the past such an act would amount to a declaration of war against the Queen's Peace and be a casus belli- a cause of war.

However, Russia has now announced that it wishes to solve its trade dispute with the EU, yet meanwhile the Nashi thugs are now picketing the Embassy of the European Union in Moscow, continuing their protest against Estonia.

The European Union and the UK in particular must now demonstrate to Russia that no progress at all is possible on improving trade or on allowing Russian entry into the WTO until they cease this illegal and disgraceful behaviour.

Without a complete change in attitude from the Kremlin, then a return to Cold War confrontation is inevitable. Despite the currently high prices of commodities, which has given Moscow a superficial swagger, in such a confrontation, Russia will be in an extremely weak position. Democratic Societies do not put the squeeze on business for political reasons, but the UK does have many ways to put pressure on Moscow- and Mr. Putin's own retirement plans may need to be changed if he were to face legal proceedings that could curtail his freedom to travel, for example.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I've been following your attempts to enlighten the denizens of Our Scotland with interest.

Oddly enough, I also watched that episode of Brideshead Revisited last weekend.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...