Skip to main content

The demise of "Society"?

I have been extraordinarily busy, and therefore finding even a few minutes to comment on things that catch my eye has been difficult, and though the next two days give the prospect of a bit of relief for Easter, it may still be that my blogging remains a bit sparse.

I spent the last two days in Slovenia, meeting people in Ljubljana and on the coast in Koper. Driving through the majestic scenery of this mountain enclave is always a pleasant experience, and although Slovenia's political and economic environment is, well, slow, the country remains for the moment the richest in Central Europe. The process of change is slower than the Baltic, but the fact is that life is pretty good here.

Like many small countries, you are struck by the very human scale of the way things are done- in the business community, there are virtually no strangers- everyone knows everyone else, or at least knows of them. Thus It is hard to keep any secrets- many were speculating as to the reasons for my own visit, and doubtless some guessed right.

The social capital in smaller countries does seem stronger than the more anonymous society of the UK. Although sometimes such anonymity is a relief, I fear that Britain is become an entire society of strangers. The drastic plunge in the numbers of people who take part in communal activity is shocking. Whether it is political parties, the churches, or even the the Scouts- there are fewer and fewer people who are prepared to volunteer. Our culture of long hours has much to do with this of course, but we also seem to be becoming more alienated from each other, in a way that the Smaller countries, such as Slovenia, would quite literally find unthinkable.

It seems ironic to me that the gimmick of the day from too many politicians is to propose a greater role for voluntary sector, at the very time when it seems that many areas of volunteership are disappearing. Scouters are regarded with the suspicion that they are latent paedophiles. The Church (of whatever denomination) is ridiculed. Politicians are vilified.

This is dangerous- the relentless barrage from an unrestrained media seems finally to be weakening part of the social foundations of our country. I am nervous for a country that relies on CCTV to "police" hooligans but will not adequately punish those who attack good citizens who intervene to prevent hooliganism personally.

To turn policing into a kind of play station game will not work.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Interesting post. We are at work here in the US trying to build up our social capital. re: your comment about government trying to tap the shrinking voluntary sector for it's problems, I think sometimes it's seen as a quick and cheap/free solution, but civil society does require investment to flourish.
Anonymous said…
Hmmm your last comment makes you sound like a Tory Cicero...........................



Lepidus.
Tristan said…
I've been wondering if the demise of 'Society' is largely a result of increase of the state and more state intervention.

The state has taken on many of the functions of society, but cannot fulfill them.

A great example is adult education - here in Chingford a community association used to run many adult education classes, until the local council took them over and marginalised voluntary groups, then adult education became subservient to the whims of politicians and now the latest fads from whitehall.
The community association is now treated as an irritation by the council, mainly because it does not control it. The clubs and societies associated with the association are put at risk, contributing to the decline of any sense of community.

The ideas of using voluntary groups more leads to this, the groups will get even more dependent upon state funding and they will do what the state wants them to do rather than what the prefer to do. They will simply become another arm of government.

Add to this the consequences of more state intervention in child rearing and the problems hilighted by Jonathan Calder.

The use of fear as a political tool furthers these problems. Especially combined with more distant policing and the decline of public spaces.
Anonymous said…
thank you nice sharing

cep program

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...