Skip to main content

More Bl@@dy rules!

Oh No!

David Cameron announces that he intends to spend some vast amount of money "to improve border security".

The trouble is that every time John Reid or another one of these clowns starts making some meaningless grandstanding gesture it delays me another five minutes at the Airport when I come back into my own country.

On Saturday after a six hour delay in Copenhagen- an ice storm, and no, don't ask me why I was coming back from Tallinn via Copenhagen- I had to wait for over half an hour just to show my passport at the European channel.

I would like to congratulate the Home Secretary on his competence- but I can't.

Both Cameron and Reid are in the business of gestures.

Personally I would like to make a fairly strong two fingered gesture at them both.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hmm. Unusually vitriolic Consul. Other countries have Border police forces. Hardly fascist is it. Cameron has sternly opposed ID cards which given the record of seemingly every IT project ever mounted in this country really is gesture stuff. Cameron's conservatives are much more libertarian than you pretend. To compare Cameron with Reid is laughable, and also damaging to those Lib Dem candidates fishing for Libertarian Tory votes in new Lib/Lab marginals. Bet you see the 2005 trend repeated again.

Lepidus.
7:07 pm
Anonymous said…
Hmmm

delay the public 5 minutes or protect the public from illegal immigration, terrorism, drug smuggling, people smuggling, arms trafficing, proliferation, espionage.

I can see it's a toughie.

Arguing that these are empty gestures or ineffectual measures is one thing. Claiming they are wrong because you were delayed 5 minutes is a weak argument. Taken to it's logical conclusion we would abandon border controls completely.
4:26 pm
Cicero said…
rk- That is not the issue: in any event it is an extra five minutes each time one of these "initiatives" gets going- so my last wait was over 30 minutes. Since we are not checking exits, the wait is basically a waste of time.

Cameron a libertarian?? Er no. Cameron and Reid are two guys on the same pendulum- lots of motion, no movement. They both compete to give the the most meaningless populist gesture possible.
5:25 pm
Anonymous said…
Sorry Cicero utter ****** if I may say so bluntly. If Cameron was like Reid we would now have 90 day detention, comedians would be in Jail under the Religious Hatred Bill, and ID cards would be in place already. A plausible argument by you but one with which I would have disagreed with would be to say Cameron whil some way Libertarian is still not far enough. To say he is the same as Reid though is nonsense. Come on Consul you can do better than this.

Lepidus.
7:04 pm
Cicero said…
Lepidus- I think you are on very shaky ground claiming Cameron as any kind of libertarian. I also think that the attempt by the Conservatives to claim the traditionally Liberal ground of civil liberties is pretty unconvincing. In government the Conservatives have tended to favour the populist rather than the effective anti-crime options: so you always try to paint the Lib Dems as soft on crime when we advocate something other than the most draconian options.

The instinct of the Conservatives has never been in favour of human rights in government- and Cameron's fine words butter no parsnips. The Tories hestiated before they opposed 90 day detention: the Liberal Democrats already knew that it was against their principles. In government the Tories would have enacted the same legislation (like they did in Northern Ireland). The Conservatives initially supported ID cards- the Liberal Democrats opposed them from the get go.

Bear in mind that Cameron's intellectual furniture allows him to speak in favour of freedom and compulsion when addressing his policies towards absent fathers. "And" Conservatism is trying to be all things to all men and it is profoundly dishonest.
11:16 am
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and ...
1 comment
Read more

The Will of the People

Many of the most criminal political minds of the past generations have claimed to be an expression of the "will of the people"... The will of the people, that is, as interpreted by themselves. Most authoritarian rulers: Napoleon III, Mussolini, Hitler, have called referendums in order to claim some spurious popular support for the actions they had already determined upon. The problem with the June 2016 European Union was that the question was actually insufficiently clear. To leave the EU was actually a vast set of choices, not one specific choice. Danial Hannan, once of faces of Vote Leave was quite clear that leaving the EU did NOT mean leaving the Single Market:    “There is a free trade zone stretching all the way from Iceland to the Russian border. We will still be part of it after we Vote Leave.” He declared: “Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market.” The problem was that this relatively moderate position was almost immediately ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...
20 comments
Read more