Skip to main content

Political shifts

Opinion polls are faintly addictive- especially for those of us with far too much anorak in our DNA. However, generally I have not tended to comment on the gyrations that we see- there is too much random walk to draw hard and fast conclusions from any given poll.

The latest opinion poll from Communicate Research seems to have some important change to the methodology- for it has catapulted the Liberal Democrats up by 50%. So CR now has the Lib Dems on 21%- roughly where we seem to be with other polls. While obviously comforting- particularly since Lib Dem support typically rises in General election campaigns- they interesting theme of this particular poll is the weakness of the Labour core vote and the increasing strength of the Lib Dem core vote.

Its only a poll- so you have to take it with all the health warnings and caveats- but the message for Labour is beginning to look a bit bleak. For the Lib Dems, across the mass of the polls there is considerable encouragement. The feedback from across the country- including local election results- seems to be consistent. After a pretty glum time, the party seems to be settling down. The collegiate and thoughtful approach of Ming Campbell- although the subject of derision from our opponents- may, perhaps, be bringing results.

Comments

Anonymous said…
As I say it is Labour not the Tories ftom whom you now draw strength. Although contain your excitement it is CR. Will we get you though to pick up the baton Britain's new relationship with Poland and Miteleuropa post 2004. Also BTW do you think you should backtrack to those Poles who stay here for implying it is only out of "inertia", has it occurred to you it might be a positive choice on some part for many, that they may actually like living in Britain. You sounded a little like Jaroslaw Kacyznski on his comments on Polish migrants to Britain.


Lepidus.
Cicero said…
I think it is clear that probably most CEE Workers do make a positive choice to come to the UK in the first place. The question is the length of time that they tend to stay- some will stay long term. but I think that most won't- Jarek Kaczynski is not too good on the economics of this, but the fact is that Poland is still "home" more than the UK.

As for the poll- not excited, CR now reflects what other polls and local by-elections seem to be saying- and that is the root of, well if not optimism, then certanly relief.
Anonymous said…
Cicero, parts of the Uk maybe more home for certain people than where they actually live, but the longer you are in any place, the more roots you put down and the more unlikely it is you will want to move. That is just a fact. With every Pole I've met here, it is a fact I welcome. I do wish though you backtrack by acknowledging the fact that Poles who choose to stay here are not doing do because they're somehow lazy. Most are technically 51%, while 49% are maybe unlikely to stay a third is not improbable. I think the Poles are great people. I just think you're close to insulting Poles who make a positive choice to live here after all.

Lepidus.
Cicero said…
Lepidus, I think that this is a wilful misunderstanding of what I am saying. Inertia does not mean laziness- often quite the reverse, people have been building businesses in the UK too. Yes, some, but we don't know how many will stay permanantly, but the vast majority will not- that is the contrast between the waves we have had from CEE this time, and for example East African Asians, who did not have the choice to go home. A third staying does seem way off the mark, since we have already had a turnover of probably 60% in two years.

While I am relaxed about the numbers, since I see immigration as a gigantic plus to the UK economy and our way of life, even if I were hostile to the whole idea, the turnover shouls tell you that these are people whose primary identity reamins Polish, Lithuanian, Slovak etc. So in the same way that Australians used to come and spend a couple of years in London, I see the same process for Central Europeans too.
Anonymous said…
Cicero,


It is not wilful. Here is the Cambridge University Press defintion of inertia "inertia (LACK OF ACTIVITY) Show phonetics
noun [U]
lack of activity or interest, or unwillingness to make an effort to do anything:"


Many immigrants to America retained even for one or two generations a different primary identity, but they stayed. You are quite correct many will go, probably the most footloose, but once they start putting kids through School etc it becomes ever harder to go back. Once a child has spent their formative years, how likely is it their parents that they will then want to uproot them back to Cracow. I do think you have to accept significant numbers are here to stay, at a minimum tens of thousands. Since we seem to be at loggerheads on this perhaps you will turn your expertise to a more fruitful area, the long term implications for us and Eastern Europe. Will they look to us for Leadership now we have literally blood toes with them.

BTW On your article is that the sound of humble pie I hear being eaten in certain Liberal Democrat circles as Ming turns things around for them.


Lepidus.
Cicero said…
Lepidus,

Yes, probably a few tens of thousands may well stay- but in the context of the millions of Brits who live overseas, that number is a drop in the bucket, and certainly not an issue that should worry anyone except the most nutcase BNP-er. In fact, as we both agree- they are a big plus for the UK.

I supported Ming all the way through, and have not changed my view.

I will blog a bit about the diaspora eventually -after all it is one of the themes of this blog.
Anonymous said…
thank you nice sharing

cep program

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

Bournemouth absence

Although I had hoped to get down to the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth this year, simple pressure of work has now made that impossible. I must admit to great disappointment. The last conference before the General Election was always likely to show a few fireworks, and indeed the conference has attracted more headlines than any other over the past three years. Some of these headlines show a significant change of course in terms of economic policy. Scepticism about the size of government expenditure has given way to concern and now it is clear that reducing government expenditure will need to be the most urgent priority of the next government. So far it has been the Liberal Democrats that have made the running, and although the Conservatives are now belatedly recognising that cuts will be required they continue to fail to provide even the slightest detail as to what they think should guide their decisions in this area. This political cowardice means that we are expected to ch