Skip to main content

Time to control taxation

A few weeks ago, the Lib Dems put forward some outline ideas on taxation that involve cutting the headline rates of income tax. I welcomed those proposals then. Last week, more detailed proposals were put forward, which continue the theme. Indeed the substantive proposals are extremely well thought out.

To my mind there is not much doubt that the Labour taxation plans have got to the point of pain. The salami tactics that they have used, while less eye catching than a straight forward increase in tax rates, have substantially boosted government revenues. Unfortunately the other side of the equation- spending- has been less well judged. The government has not set in hand effective ways to control and administer spending, neither on health or welfare nor on education. Part of this is the fact that they refuse to recognise that individual circumstances make blanket spending commitments highly inefficient. The result has been a general increase in costs, but a sharp fall in overall productivity.

Thus Liberal Democrat tax plans should be seen in a wider context. Firstly, the burden of administration is now too expensive- this was part of the thinking behind our proposal to abolish the DTi, but this was not the only area where we intend to deregulate. In large areas of administration and regulation we have proposed the wider use of sunset clauses and the retirement of irrelevant legislation. The cost of doing business in the UK should not rise any further, and if at all possible should be reduced. This includes the cost of doing government business.

The other side of the coin is personal taxation- as more fees are collected by the Labour government, and such financial packages as student grants are phased out, the overall burden on the tax payer as increased quite sharply. The time has come to cut the overall burden of personal taxation. In particular, income tax rates should now be cut.

The next question is how to make up the short term funding gap. This, we have proposed, can be done in the short term by increasing taxation on polluting and energy inefficient activities. In my opinion this can only be a short term policy- since if successful, it would automatically reduce revenue. The longer term goal will have to be to get government to function within tighter financial limits.

I see Tory bloggers trying, ostentatiously, to either rubbish or ignore these proposals.

They fear them because they know that they are credible, substantive and effective, and they are right to be afraid- anything the Conservatives now talk about in tax or environmental policy is just going to look like "me too".

Mind you the policy-free vacuum that is the Blair-lite Tory Party increasingly lacks credibility across the board.


James said…
Hear, hear. I'm very glad that someone is saying this. Tax cuts are associated with breaks for the already rich, but in fact the part of personal income taxation that needs to be hacked away at is the absurdly low level at which the personal allowance ends.
Drastically raising this threshold would be more effective at getting people back into work than half a dozen complex tax credit schemes because it simplifies the incentive to earn wages.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo