Skip to main content

Time for the Sun to set on the Murdoch Empire

The fall of the News of the World was a curious affair. It seemed to me at the time to be something of an over reaction to close the newspaper, even in the face of public outcry over the phone hacking scandal. It only made sense in the context of launching a seven-day version of The Sun, the NoTW's daily stable-mate. Of course that is now what has happened.


However the "sacrifice" of the NoTW begins to make far greater sense now that we understand the seemingly far greater level of corruption that was going on at The Sun itself. In now seems quite clear that the closure of the NoTW was a diversionary tactic by Rupert  Murdoch in order to protect his most popular title and even extend its franchise to seven day publishing.


However it is now not just Vince Cable who is on the warpath against Murdoch.


Every new revelation makes it quite clear that Murdoch has presided over a totally corrupt system. He has relied on corrupt payments to public officials and covert pressure that does not stop short of blackmail. Bribery and Blackmail were not -it seems- occasional exceptions, but the normal way that News International has conducted its business.


Given the extremely tepid support that Rupert Murdoch has offered the current government, and his continuing flirtation with the SNP, demonstrated in his rather ill advised tweet on the subject of Alex Salmond, which seems to have resulted in the leak of the SNP's proposed referendum date to the Scottish Sun, David Cameron and Nick Clegg neither owe Rupurt Murdoch any favours, nor
are they his prisoners.


As these revelations mount, it seems self evident that should the criminal investigations lead to prosecution, then the entire question of whether Rupert Murdoch is a fit and proper person to have such control over any media outlet in Britain needs to be investigated.


James Murdoch already faces the real prospect of serious charges under the foreign corrupt practices act in the United States. A wide range of charges against News International employees is now under investigation in the UK too and several key NI executives are apparently set to face trial.


The scandal of Parliamentary expenses over the past years now looks like pretty small beer against the almost mafia-like racketeering that seems to have been going on at the UK's largest media group.


If these prosecutions result in guilty verdicts, then the reaction of the British regulatory authorities should be swift and total: the complete expulsion of any firm controlled or influenced by the Murdoch family interest in the UK. 


It seems more than time to clean the stables- and the black heart of Murdoch's twisted and corrupt empire would certainly be the best place to start.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...