Skip to main content

Putin = Mugabe

Yet another demonstration in Moscow has attracted tens of thousands of people to take a stand against the idea that Vladimir Putin can return to the Presidency of Russia that he only vacated in 2008.


The fact is that whatever the expressed will of the Russian people, it has already been overruled by the will of Vladimir Putin himself. Mr. Putin is determined to maintain his power, even in the face of determined protest.


Some, including the gaoled tycoon, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, suggest that change is inevitable in Russia, but to me this underestimates the tenacity of Putin- a man who glories in the name of "Chekist" and continues to lament the fall of the USSR.


The Cheka was the extraordinarily brutal secret police established after the Bolshevik seizure of power which inflicted mass murder upon the population of Russia and beyond in order to impose the will of Lenin and Stalin. The founder of the Cheka, a Polish nobleman, Feliks Dzierzynski, was a man of twisted integrity who utter subsumed his personality to the will of the murderous ideology he served. It is this barbarian for whom Putin expresses the greatest of admiration. The subsequent incarnations of the Cheka: OGPU, NKVD, MVD, MGB, KGB as well as the Cheka itself, committed crimes on an industrial scale, untramelled by the slightest scruple, let alone a single shred of decency. As feared and hated as the Nazi Gestapo and with even more blood on its hands, the Soviet organs of state security remain unpunished, and under Vladimir Putin they are even praised for their despicable and vile crimes.


I do not think that we can trust to the tender mercies of a man formed by such a criminal organisation as the KGB, and one who, moreover, continues to use the same methods, as the astonishing death toll among Russian journalists and the public murder of Aleksander Litvinenko in London, amongst others, testifies all too starkly.


Even the supposed "assassination plot" against Putin- conveniently discovered a week before the election- smacks more of a KGB plot than of any genuine conspiracy.


So Vladimir Putin will, continue in office and will continue to cozy up to the enemies of the West, like Hugo Chavez or Bashar Al-Assad- funded by the high price of oil that his political meddling in the middle east conveniently supports. 


Meanwhile, unless the Russian people can take responsibility for their own affairs, the despair that is fueling a mass exit of the young from the Russian Kleptocracy will only grow. The failure of the past is not the solution of the future- and maybe eventually there will be a real conspiracy.


As with Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, it seems that the only way to remove the Chekist-inspired leader in Russia will indeed be when he eventually dies- he will never leave office willingly. 


Tragically, the damage he can do to Russia and the world before this will be profound and long lasting. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...