What then? Are we better than they? No, in no way.
For we previously charged both Jews and Greeks, that they are all under sin
Romans 3:9
The Legg report on British MPs expenses looks to be a fiasco: by saying that so many MPs are guilty it means that individual culpability is diminished. It lets the most guilty off the hook while also tarring the essentially innocent with the brush of corruption.
A truly terrible result that will undermine faith in British democracy to the point of crisis.
For we previously charged both Jews and Greeks, that they are all under sin
Romans 3:9
The Legg report on British MPs expenses looks to be a fiasco: by saying that so many MPs are guilty it means that individual culpability is diminished. It lets the most guilty off the hook while also tarring the essentially innocent with the brush of corruption.
A truly terrible result that will undermine faith in British democracy to the point of crisis.
Comments
"If all are guilty, then everyone is - to varying degrees" would seem a more appropriate approach. The degree to which they are considered guilty of course depends on whether many Fee Office 'approved' expenditures are retrospectively classified as non-approved. I would suggest that where expenditures have been unreasonable, (and I recognise the difficulty of defining this exactly), they should be. The illegal claims should obviously be treated as such.
I agree, however, that this is going to descend further into black comedy.