Skip to main content

MPs: if all are guilty, then no one is

What then? Are we better than they? No, in no way.
For we previously charged both Jews and Greeks, that they are all under sin

Romans 3:9

The Legg report on British MPs expenses looks to be a fiasco: by saying that so many MPs are guilty it means that individual culpability is diminished. It lets the most guilty off the hook while also tarring the essentially innocent with the brush of corruption.

A truly terrible result that will undermine faith in British democracy to the point of crisis.


thepoliteer said…
Hi Cisero.

"If all are guilty, then everyone is - to varying degrees" would seem a more appropriate approach. The degree to which they are considered guilty of course depends on whether many Fee Office 'approved' expenditures are retrospectively classified as non-approved. I would suggest that where expenditures have been unreasonable, (and I recognise the difficulty of defining this exactly), they should be. The illegal claims should obviously be treated as such.

I agree, however, that this is going to descend further into black comedy.
Richard T said…
At the risk of being thought cynical, I wonder if this is the point of Legg. By involving all MPs in a retrospective review of what had been passed as reasonable, as you say he has put up a smokescreen whereby the really guilty can retreat under its cover? We can count on the majority of the press concentrating on the trivial and on 'hate figures' like Jacqui Smith and Gordon Brown who have already been through the mill and missing the point as to why rich men like Gideon Osborne and David Cameron sucked at the state's teat to get second houses that they well afford for themselves and in the former case then played the second home game to avoid capital gains tax. Don't even think of their hypocrisy in criticising folk on incapacity benefit as this is a different matter of only claiming their entitlement under the expenses rules. Et voila the guilty escape scrutiny and public disgrace.
Ed Butt said…
I think British politics was already way past the point of crisis. but as Brown is one of the major offenders it will be interesting to see if he survives until Christmas.

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

Bournemouth absence

Although I had hoped to get down to the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth this year, simple pressure of work has now made that impossible. I must admit to great disappointment. The last conference before the General Election was always likely to show a few fireworks, and indeed the conference has attracted more headlines than any other over the past three years. Some of these headlines show a significant change of course in terms of economic policy. Scepticism about the size of government expenditure has given way to concern and now it is clear that reducing government expenditure will need to be the most urgent priority of the next government. So far it has been the Liberal Democrats that have made the running, and although the Conservatives are now belatedly recognising that cuts will be required they continue to fail to provide even the slightest detail as to what they think should guide their decisions in this area. This political cowardice means that we are expected to ch