Skip to main content

MPs: if all are guilty, then no one is

What then? Are we better than they? No, in no way.
For we previously charged both Jews and Greeks, that they are all under sin

Romans 3:9

The Legg report on British MPs expenses looks to be a fiasco: by saying that so many MPs are guilty it means that individual culpability is diminished. It lets the most guilty off the hook while also tarring the essentially innocent with the brush of corruption.

A truly terrible result that will undermine faith in British democracy to the point of crisis.
Labels:

Comments

thepoliteer said…
Hi Cisero.

"If all are guilty, then everyone is - to varying degrees" would seem a more appropriate approach. The degree to which they are considered guilty of course depends on whether many Fee Office 'approved' expenditures are retrospectively classified as non-approved. I would suggest that where expenditures have been unreasonable, (and I recognise the difficulty of defining this exactly), they should be. The illegal claims should obviously be treated as such.

I agree, however, that this is going to descend further into black comedy.
11:09 am
Richard T said…
At the risk of being thought cynical, I wonder if this is the point of Legg. By involving all MPs in a retrospective review of what had been passed as reasonable, as you say he has put up a smokescreen whereby the really guilty can retreat under its cover? We can count on the majority of the press concentrating on the trivial and on 'hate figures' like Jacqui Smith and Gordon Brown who have already been through the mill and missing the point as to why rich men like Gideon Osborne and David Cameron sucked at the state's teat to get second houses that they well afford for themselves and in the former case then played the second home game to avoid capital gains tax. Don't even think of their hypocrisy in criticising folk on incapacity benefit as this is a different matter of only claiming their entitlement under the expenses rules. Et voila the guilty escape scrutiny and public disgrace.
9:18 am
Ed Butt said…
I think British politics was already way past the point of crisis. but as Brown is one of the major offenders it will be interesting to see if he survives until Christmas.
5:56 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...
Post a Comment
Read more

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...
20 comments
Read more

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...
14 comments
Read more