Skip to main content

Europe creates a crisis for the Conservatives

The release of the Conservative Home poll on the eve of their party conference creates a real headache for David Cameron. Even as it was, the Irish Yes vote on the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon would have put Europe higher up the agenda for the conference that the leadership would have probably preferred. The problem is that in the details of the poll: only 16% suggesting that the treaty of Lisbon should be accepted and nearly three quarters want a complete renegotiation of British membership. Perhaps even more extraordinary, about 40% of Conservative activists actually want to withdraw from the European Union completely.

The scale of Europhobia amongst the Conservatives is pretty dramatic and leaves the young Conservative leader with very little room for manoeuvre. The plain fact is that even with a filibuster by the right-wing President of the Czech Republic, Vaclav Klaus, all of the members of the EU- including the UK- are likely to have ratified the treaty by the end of 2009. After the astonishingly difficult negotiations over nearly a decade, the reforms of the European Union- however imperfect and partial they may be- will have finally been achieved. No one wants to go through the process again. There is simple exhaustion across the continent about the whole process. Once the institutions have adapted to the changes, the appetite for further upheaval will be nil.

David Cameron knows this. He also knows that if he is elected in early Summer next year, he will have to face a gigantic overhaul of the public sector which, however necessary, is going to be very painful and is going to make him very unpopular. In my view he is more pragmatic about the EU than the poll shows the rest of his party as being. I suspect that his original game plan was to essentially accept Lisbon, negotiate some relatively cosmetic changes and put this to a referendum with a government recommendation that the UK votes "Yes" and therefore stays inside the European Union. It seemed to me to be a neat political solution that would get Cameron off the horns of the dilemma.

What the poll shows, though, is that he could end up be caught between the rabid Europhobia of the majority of his party supporters- including a large number of people who may end up being elected to Parliament- and the unwillingness or inability of the other 26 member states to offer him sufficient changes to the treaty that he will need as sops to his domestic critics. It is a crisis that could define the whole ethos of a future Conservative administration and distract attention from the far more critical problems of public sector reform.

The Irish Yes vote must have been planned for, and the leadership would be quite aware of the visceral nature of Tory feelings concerning the European Union. Nevertheless, even if "forewarned is forearmed" the European issue is one that has the potential to upset the Conservative applecart even more severely than Liberal splits on Ireland in the 19th Century.

The Conservative leadership- even if not, apparently, its membership- knows that committing to withdrawal from the European Union at a time when the British economy is so fragile would have a drastic effect on investment and confidence. Sterling, already weak, could drop dramatically, with severe effects on inflation and British standards of living. International investors, already unhappy at the currency volatility that they have had to endure from their British investments, will demand much a higher risk premium- just at the point where the UK needs to tap the global markets to fund the ballooning deficit. The British AAA rating- already under review with a negative outlook would finally be gone. Cameron knows that the economic effects of even hinting at withdrawal would have political effects that would probably destroy the Conservatives as a government party for years or even decades.

On the other hand he will now have to face his activists. I suspect he will continue his careful pose of "Euro-scepticism" while tacitly implying that he shares the Europhobes hostile view of EU membership. Nevertheless, instead of the triumphant pre-election love-fest that he may have wanted, the Tory conference will now be reported as facing a "European crisis" and all questions will come back to this. Conservative dyspepsia on the EU risks being revealed as full blown irritable bowel syndrome.

The further problem is that Cameron has not yet "sealed the deal". Hostility to Gordon Brown's Labour government is entrenched, but poll after poll makes clear that support for the Conservatives is still very tepid. The wave of enthusiasm that swept Tony Blair into office is not being matched by a similar wave for Cameron's Conservatives. Though I doubt not that the Tory Boys and Twinsets will give their leader a rousing ovation at the end of his speech, there is a growing sense of doubt. The Politics Home poll of marginals shows Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats looking more resilient and also a potentially good result for Plaid the SNP and even a gain or two for the Greens in the next Parliament. The fall of Socialism is increasing political diversity rather than necessarily flowing to the Conservatives. Though the crude numbers are hard to interpret, we should remember that the Conservatives still have a mountain to climb when it comes to achieving a decent working Parliamentary majority. The fear of several key people around Cameron is that the Conservatives may not be able to get much above a single figure majority- a situation where an influx of young Europhobic MPs could be a highly explosive mixture.

The task for David Cameron at Manchester this conference is very delicate. He must try to stick to his game plan, but he knows that the media narrative, together with some of the more excitable Europhobes could end up derailing the whole conference unless he is very careful indeed.

I doubt whether he is looking forward to the conference with much enthusiasm.


neil craig said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Eben Marks said…
How do you think the Irish vote will affect the Lib Dems chances? Presumably anything that is bad for the Tories is good for the Lib Dems but do you think they will be seen as ahead of the curve on something that was inevitable and will benefit when the reforms are seen to be much less scary than the Tories have said they will be, or will euroscepticism rise even further?
Cicero said…
My personal view is that the political pendulum in the UK is currently at just about the most Europhobic point and I think that it is beginning swing back. The key issue is that although the EU has a vast number of faults it is also the only way we have to retain any kind of credible influence in a world increasingly dominiated by the big three: US, China and India.

I think the Lib Dems pro-EU stance has been a significant burden, but as it becomes clear that the costs of withdrawal are so huge that we might as well make the best of it as a member then at least they will benefit from an abscence of a negative.

However I think that the Lib Dems are going to have to change substantially if they are going to have a real impact on government- as I will make clear in a later posting.
constant gina said…
You're right, it's intolerable. This will push some people to declare UDI.

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

Bournemouth absence

Although I had hoped to get down to the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth this year, simple pressure of work has now made that impossible. I must admit to great disappointment. The last conference before the General Election was always likely to show a few fireworks, and indeed the conference has attracted more headlines than any other over the past three years. Some of these headlines show a significant change of course in terms of economic policy. Scepticism about the size of government expenditure has given way to concern and now it is clear that reducing government expenditure will need to be the most urgent priority of the next government. So far it has been the Liberal Democrats that have made the running, and although the Conservatives are now belatedly recognising that cuts will be required they continue to fail to provide even the slightest detail as to what they think should guide their decisions in this area. This political cowardice means that we are expected to ch