After the disputed election in Iran, where, despite a huge increase in turnout, the election is said to have brought no change, I can not help noticing one very important thing:
People who win elections by the margin suggested by officials in Iran do not usually need to arrest their opponents.
It therefore looks pretty clear that the populist Ahmadi-Nejad has stolen the election.
The reaction in the clerical state is already violent and could become explosive.
Not good in a state that is already quite close to gaining a nuclear bomb.
It underlines the nature of the regime that Ahmadi-Nejad wants that he shows such contempt for democracy. It will now be a test of the far more pluralist Iranian society as to whether this crime is allowed to go unpunished.
People who win elections by the margin suggested by officials in Iran do not usually need to arrest their opponents.
It therefore looks pretty clear that the populist Ahmadi-Nejad has stolen the election.
The reaction in the clerical state is already violent and could become explosive.
Not good in a state that is already quite close to gaining a nuclear bomb.
It underlines the nature of the regime that Ahmadi-Nejad wants that he shows such contempt for democracy. It will now be a test of the far more pluralist Iranian society as to whether this crime is allowed to go unpunished.
Comments