Skip to main content

Oh really?

OK, now the dead tree press, aka "The Daily Telegraph" has published the expenses of all the parties.

Labour- Yueeeeech, Tories.. clean moat, Sir? Lib Dem- nice to see you look after your daughter, Mr. George.

Now, will the Journalists on the Telegraph please publish their expenses.

Oooooh Noooo- we work for a private company...

"Power without responsibility, the prerogative of the harlot through the ages".
Labels:

Comments

Richard T said…
There is of course an argument that the revenue for the press barons does come from the public and hence there is a legitmate interest in seeing how it's used - tax avoidance by the Murdoch empire, the Barclays and the Harmondsworths. Did I mention the vast sums the proprietor of the Express pays himself? I don't want to go into moral relativism but there is such a thing as sin and the first stone and I struggle to see spotlessness amongst those who will profit from these exposures. As you say, Baldwin had it spot on.
11:51 am
Bishop Hill said…
"There is of course an argument that the revenue for the press barons does come from the public and hence there is a legitmate interest in seeing how it's used."

It is, of course, a spurious argument though.
7:24 pm
Anonymous said…
(1) Daily Telegraph journalists are not paid by the tax payer (you and me). I care where my taxes go, and I don't care where Telegraph subscribers' money goes.

(2) The Daily Telegraph is subject to market forces, and the House of Commons is not. If the Telegraph's expenses can't be afforded, the Daily Telegraph goes under and the journalists lose their jobs.

(3) Misuse of public funds is a very serious matter.
9:41 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...
Post a Comment
Read more

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...
20 comments
Read more

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...
14 comments
Read more