Skip to main content

The night is darkest..

It is just over seven months since Bear Sterns was forcibly incorporated into JP Morgan. It is just over six weeks since the United States government took over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It is a month since Merill Lynch sought an emergency sale to Bank of America and Lehman Brothers went under. AIG was rescued four weeks ago. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley were transformed into bank holding companies on September 22nd.

Over the past four weeks all of the listed former building societies in the UK have disappeared. HBOS has been forced to merge with Lloyds TSB. Of the former big four clearing banks two have essentially been nationalised.

In the Euro-zone, Dexia and Fortis have been rescued, the latter forced to merge with BNP-Paribas.

The run on the Icelandic kronur has brought the country to the brink of penury.

Any single one of these events would have been considered spectacular on its own, taken together they represent the greatest single economic failure in at least two generations.

The meltdown of Black Friday dwarfs any previous crash., but perhaps when we examine the crisis that has been unfolding over the last year, perhaps we should not be so shocked.

Now, the markets appear to believe that the effective nationalisation of the banking system around the world can stabilise the situation at least for the immediate future. Eventually the work-out of the debt will reduce the overall level of the bill to the tax-payers. However, while the total bill is likely to be only between 10% and 20% of the total, that is still a dramatic increase in the level of state debt- a debt that we will pass on to unborn generations.

I will leave it to economic historians to analyse and attribute the blame for the meltdown. However, the consequences of banks' risk modelling- the fundamental systemic flaws that Nassim Nicholas Taleb identified some years ago- must surely be the first in line.

There are also immediate consequences of the meltdown. Much that we took for granted before last week's Black Friday no longer holds.

The first consequence must surely be the severe punishment of the American Republican Party at the polls on November 4th. The corruption and incompetence of the catastrophic Bush administration has been truly wretched to behold. The splits in the party, revealed to appalling effect by the failure of Republicans to back the Paulson plan in the Congress on September 29th. Despite Sen. McCain's undoubted courage and strength of character, his unhappy choice of Paleo-Conservative Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate is set to deliver the Presidency to Sen. Obama by a landslide. Even John McCain's many positive qualities can not stop the rout, and the Republican party will take at least a decade from the disaster of the Bush-Cheney administration. The futility of this most arrogant administration seems set in retrospect to make the malaise of Jimmy Carter look like a golden age. The Democrats may indeed win states that they have not won since the 1960s. McCain was ahead in September, he is well behind now.

In the United Kingdom, it is clear that Gordon Brown has had a good crisis. Britain, as a leading financial centre, was duty bound to play an important role, but Mr. Brown with his Treasury experience behind him, has been able to push for measures that seem set to be the model, not only for other states in Europe, but in the United States too. It remains to be seen whether this success transfers into a lead in the opinion polls, but it certainly puts Labour back in the game.

Andrew Neal, interviewing Nick Clegg the other day asked "who is listening to the Liberal Democrats anymore", but probably Neal's vanity lives in a world where Vince Cable does not. In fact the Liberal Democrats have found a figure that is respected and listened to across the party spectrum. Indeed Dr. Cable has had an even better crisis than Mr. Brown and has been ahead of the crisis at every stage. By contrast Messrs Osbourne and Cameron have struggled not to appear shrill and lightweight. The impact of the crisis on British politics remains to be seen, but it is clearly going to be a far more open game than it was for much of 2008.

Another unexpected gainer has been the European Union. Despite the constant sniping from anti-Europeans like Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, the EU has not seen a meltdown. Indeed the Euro has been much more resilient than any forecast. Despite the lack of a central point of authority for bank supervision, the co-ordination of the contact between the various separate central banks, while far from ideal, has so far proven robust.

Russia has been another big loser. Although it continues to maintain a highly aggressive stance- continuing with the missile tests this week which simulated a nuclear launch against a British target city. It can not be sustained with oil back down below $80/bbl. The damage to Russia's international credibility from the repeated closure of the Moscow markets during the crisis has been substantial. Those members of the Silovik state who advocate greater economic freedom may have scored a small victory- but even the giant Russian reserves have not prevented an even greater meltdown in Russia than elsewhere. Russia has been damaged badly by the crisis.

As the markets begin to take stock and new patterns of global finance begin to reform, it seems as though firms like GLG, Och-Ziff, Perry Capital and Citadel will fill the vacuum created by the collapse of the old Investment bank model. To an extent the world is reforming in the pattern of the 1930s- commercial banks tightly regulated and conservative and investment banks free wheeling and creative- but only risking their own money and those of their partners.

It has been a hell of a ride to get us back to where we were before- and the political and other consequences may take many years to play out.

Comments

Newmania said…
The Conservative Party still has commanding lead in the Polls the Liberal Party are still irrelevant notwithstanding the BBC`s love affair with Cable. The EU has shown itself to be an expensive irrelevance as times get tough we will see how much every household feels like parting with £5000 just to justify a tribe of freeloaders their easy lives and ill-gotten power over us .
My belief is the Liberals will bumble on as usual the Labour Party will enjoy some relief sufficient to save Gordon brown to the joy of the right . The electorate will then face a trade union financed tax spend and bully PM already running the banks and with ambitions to snuff out economic freedom in the country. I cannot see another term for Brown.
You omitted to mention the one person really suffering who is Alec Salmon. Looks to me as if you can continue to have your own Parliament and yet tell us how to live for a while yet. This must be dealt with but Independence for Scotland is surely dead.
Anonymous said…
The danger with Salmond's fall is that it buys Labour a "get out of jail free card", potentially allowing them to cling to power in Westminster on the back of the over-represented Scots.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo