Skip to main content

For fresh bank confidence

Another week begins with a panicky market marking down value across the board. Even though the UK banking system has now largely reverted to the Pre-liberalisation big four: Barclays, Lloyds, Natwest (RBS) and Midland (HSBC) plus the government and the large Spanish bank, Banco Santander, there is still pressure on the British government to follow Germany, Denmark and Ireland and issue an unlimited guarantee to British bank depositors.

Now, this is getting silly.

Firstly the scale of the guarantee is much bigger for the UK banking sector than it is for the others- largely because the UK depositor base is much bigger, so it is more difficult for Britain. Yet paradoxically the larger base is a sign of the relative strength of UK banks- they are able to fund relatively more from deposits than from the money market and in the current circumstances that is a good thing.

Despite the fall out of the Lehman collapse, the British bank sector has now consolidated dramatically and although RBS faces problems with their acquisition of ABN Amro and the impact of the crisis spreading to Asia will also hurt HSBC, the fact is that all UK banks are now solvent enough to cope with the crisis, at least for the next few months. Meanwhile, Banco Santander has substantial resources and the banking of the Bank of Spain and the ECB. Despite the twitterings of Ambrose Evans Pritchard that the European financial system would fail, in fact the united European political will to deal with the crisis is growing- as indeed it must.

It is quite clear that the actions of a lone government to deal with the crisis, even when that government is the United States, are now insufficient. The British government, despite being outside the Euro zone, recognises that it must co-ordinate its actions with the rest of the European Union. As Iceland, faced with economic catastrophe, now pleads to join the European Union, the Anti-European vision of a "buccaneering Britain" outside the EU now looks like the absurd bravado that its always was.

The fact is that in the face of the emerging economic meltdown, the governments of the EU have no alternative but to increase the scope of their co-operation. The difficulties hit by first the US and then the UK are no less serious in Europe, and potentially even Asia will face the same crisis, although perhaps to a lesser degree.

In the end, this remains a matter of confidence. The UK banking system is clearly pretty sound, yet it could still be undermined by a failure of confidence. The incompetence of the Bush administration has a global impact, but one that can be off set by the Congress behaving more responsibly but also by a concerted approach in the EU and in Asia. The Brown government has made several missteps, however the time has come when a clear vision from Downing street could have a positive effect, not just in London, but in European Union and in the wider world.

When "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself", the presence of clear headed leadership is critical. It will not be found in Washington. Can it be found in London?

The next six weeks will decide whether we are looking at a 1981 Recession or a 1931 Depression.

The omens are not looking good.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Cicero


Um don't you feel that the Icelandic mess has rather more to do with them morphing into the first ever sovereign Hedge fund. EU membership is no more a protection against Government stupidity see Irish and Spanish Property markets than non membership is. As for European unity there was precious little sign of it when Merkel appeared to guarantee everything, only backtracking after some pretty heavy phone calls from elsewhere in the EU.


Lepidus
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...