Skip to main content

Democracy Tables

An interesting idea has been to pool the results of surveys of different aspects of democracy- transparency, press freedom, corruption etc. to create a table ranking the level of democracy in different states.

Some very interesting results: Finland is number one, Myanmar (Burma) is bottom.

Inside the European Union Greece does not even make it into the first division and Italy only just makes it. Perhaps even more worryingly - Bulgaria is also in the second division, whereas Romania ranks in the third division even below Serbia.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The UK is still in the top ten despite our current government - is this because the system and culture has been strong enough to resist their repressive tendencies, they aren't actually that repressive after all, or that everyone else is getting more authoritarian as well?
rjdbham@aol.com said…
I'm a bit dubious. The UK is so high in terms of "democracy" yet we have an unelected upper chamber and a lower chamber elected by a bizarre First Past The Post that seriously distorts the relationship between votes and seats.
rk said…
I'm surprised rjbham that you consider the House of Lords and FPTP as compromising our democratic credentials when elsewhere on this blog you appear to argue that the quite good health service and alleged openness of the public in criticising their government are reasons to overlook Cuba’s appalling record on democracy.
Cicero said…
Notwithstanding the problems of our constitution, I think it is clear that there is still a basic fair play, but "the price of freedom is eternal vigilance".

However what bothers me is that we are *always* behind Scandinavia and New Zealand- I would hope we had a bit more ambition for our freedom.
rjdbham@aol.com said…
>>you appear to argue that the quite good health service and alleged openness of the public in criticising their government are reasons to overlook Cuba’s appalling record on democracy<<

I appear to you, RK, as doing that. My argument was, in fact, rather different to that.

I'd like PR in both the UK and Cuba.
rjdbham@aol.com said…
Maybe I can use this as an opportunity to plug some content on the Make Votes Count website. They have posted material from their fringe meetings at the party conferences.

Lib Dem: www.makemyvotecount.org.uk/opus25257.html
Labour: www.makemyvotecount.org.uk/opus25259.html
+ full audio (mp3) and transcript www.makemyvotecount.org.uk/opus25246.html
Conservative: www.makemyvotecount.org.uk/opus25277.html - including full
audio and transcript
rk said…
All I ask rjbham is that you retain a sense of perspective. Your support for the USSR and your refusal to label Cuba as a dictatorship are not entirely without logic in themselves but they sit uneasily with your purist attitude to democracy in the UK. To hold both views simultaneously requires you to overlook the enormous failings and democratic deficits of both communist systems, either that or a pathological bias against the British system.

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and Brexit are the Pearl Harbor and the Fall of Singapore in Russia's Hybrid war against the West.

In December 1941, Imperial Japan launched a surprise attack on the United States at Pearl Harbor. After the subsequent declaration of war, within three days, the Japanese had sunk the British warships, HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse, and the rapid Japanese attack led to the surrender of Hong Kong on Christmas Day 1941 and the fall of Singapore only two months after Pearl Harbor. These were the opening blows in the long war of the Pacific that cost over 30,000,000 lives and was only ended with the detonations above Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

"History doesn't often repeat itself, but it rhymes" is an aphorism attributed to Mark Twain, and in a way it seems quite appropriate when we survey the current scene. 

In 1941, Imperial Japan, knowing its own weakness, chose a non-conventional form of war, the surprise attack. Since the end of his first Presidential term, Vladimir Putin, knowing Russia's weakness, has also chosen non-conventional ways to promote his domestic powe…

The American National nightmare becomes a global nightmare

It is a basic contention of this blog that Donald J Trump is not fit for office.

A crooked real estate developer with a dubious past and highly questionable finances. he has systematically lied his way into financial or other advantage. His personal qualities include vulgarity, sexual assault allegations and fraudulent statements on almost every subject. 

He lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes.

He has, of course, been under criminal investigation practically since before he took the oath of office. The indictment of some of closest advisers is just the beginning. His track record suggests that in due course there is no action he will not take, whether illegal or unconstitutional in order to derail his own inevitable impeachment and the indictments that must surely follow the successful investigation of Robert Mueller into his connections with Russia.

However, all of that is a matter for the American people. 

It is also a matter for the American people that Trump is cheating…

The rumbling financial markets

Security specialists use a variety of ways to address the risks that they face: and these risk assessments are made in the certain knowledge that the actors in the system hold only incomplete information. Although much mocked at the time, Donald Rumsfeld’s categorization of “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns”, is now generally recognized as a succinct summery of his strategic quandaries.
By contrast, actors in the financial markets have a more sanguine assessment of the risks they deal with: they divide them into two kinds of risk: quantifiable and unquantifiable. Unquantifiable risk is not generally considered, since there is usually no financial profit that can be made except from pure supposition. Therefore for the purposes of the financial markets, any given event is priced relative to its level of probability, that is to say its quantifiable risk. 
Depending on the market, higher levels of risk generally carry higher prices, lower levels generally lower prices. Clearly such an…