Skip to main content

Now is the winter of Russian discontent

As regular readers know, I am very sceptical about the stability of the Russian government. The supposedly large poll leads that Vladimir Putin's United Russia has held always seemed to me to be suspect, given the political history of the country. Although dissent was not open, it was always there.


I pointed out that the decision of Vladimir Putin to return to the Presidency was a critical mistake that would not strengthen, but weaken the regime. So it is proving to be. Inside Russia, the "September 24th coup" is now seen as such a blatant disregard of democracy, that even those who previously supported Putin have begun to disassociate themselves from his government. The fact is that the Putinistas by ignoring the voters completely, were placing themselves above the constitution. The result is a chorus of contempt that is going to derail Mr. Putin's plans to remain in power for a further two Presidential terms, and may even stop Mr. Putin from returning to power at all in the Presidential elections, just announced for 4th March 2012.


The turning point was reached a few days ago when Mr. Putin was booed at a marshal arts event. Though not quite the fall of Ceausescu, the fact is that at various other sporting events even mention of Putin or United Russia has led to a repeat of boos and catcalls against the regime. It is clear, that even with the substantial vote rigging that is likely to take place in favour of United Russia at the Parliamentary elections, the collapse in support for the ruling party can not be hidden.


Authoritarian government in Russia has always failed. Those who insist that "Russians are children" who "like an authoritarian leader" ignore the fact that the alternative has not been tried. Russia has not yet entered the post Communist world. The Siloviki - the sinister security people who control United Russia- are all linked to the organs of repression of Communism.


Despite the brutality of the regime, it can not disguise its essential weakness. The economic and political challenges: industrial restructuring, North Caucasian terrorism, the threat of secession of non Russian regions, the challenge of China, would be daunting enough even if Putin enjoyed unquestioned legitimacy. The growing public derision for United Russia shows that he no longer has such legitimacy.


The huge miscalculation of September 24th grows more obvious by the day, and it grows ever more likely that the changes that Russians demand of their government are not longer simply cosmetic ones. 


The conditions for a Russian Spring may not yet be in place, but Mr. Putin's government can no longer dismiss such a possibility.


Russians too, like Arabs, are seeking an end to authoritarian government.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...