Skip to main content

How the Liberal Democrats are recovering

I often find that returning to the UK for a rare visit is a rather sobering experience. The difficulties the government faces seem exposed in sharp relief when you have been away for a while.

This trip was a little different.

Yes, it is all to obvious that the physical infrastructure needs investment: but despite potential future problems, Crossrail is being built- and the tunnel portal, close to Paddington station is well underway. Above the ground, Heathrow's new terminal is also now taking shape, and flying over London, the Olympic stadium gleams above the winding river Lea. The giant Shard office building too is nearing completion. The pace of development is visibly quicker than last year, so for the time being at least, London is moving forward. The sense of depression that seemed all pervasive in the summer is also a little lighter.

For the first time in a while, I went to visit a friend who is a Member of Parliament. Indeed, he has become a Liberal Democrat minister in the coalition government. Before I meet him, I talk things over with my Uncle who is a very long serving Lib Dem MP. He reflects that the situation for the party is not beyond recovery, and that behind the scenes, some extraordinary progress is being made. I am sceptical, but I resolve to quiz my friend, who has emerged as one of the key ministers, when we meet later.

It was the day after the Conservatives had split dramatically over the perennial issue of "Europe". The atmosphere in the evening fug of the bars and tea rooms remains excited and it is clearly the leading topic of conversation. The kind of people who call the European Union the "EUSSR"- which as a resident of a country formerly occupied by the USSR, I find incredibly insulting and puerile- are much in evidence. Yet as my friend points out, the "antis" lost, and more to the point, the Prime Minister has even more reasons to be grateful to the Lib Dems and irritated with his Tory colleagues.

It is, he points out, something of a distraction anyway: there is a crisis in the Euro, but there is nothing positively specific that the "antis" can put forward: it is still a visceral and rather inchoate rage. Meanwhile, the Minister makes a key point: 

"This is the first time since the 1920's that Liberal ministers can put their policies into action. We may not get a second chance, indeed the polls tell us that we won't. While the Tories are content to wait until the next election, since they believe that will get a majority, we have no time to waste. The result is that we are enacting far more of our program than they are."

He added:

"We can now point to a solid block of genuinely Liberal achievements, particularly increasing the tax free allowance to £10,000, and while we have made mistakes- and how could we not have done, under such difficult circumstances?- we have genuinely worked for the national interest, even when it looks like our party interest will be overwhelmed"

So, far from the Lib Dem ministers being cowed by the dire polls, in fact they seem to have a real fire in their bellies. While it is clear that the local elections in May will probably continue to see a negative trend for the party, at least in Scotland, it strikes me that the Liberal element in the government may yet prove, by working for the country in a fairly selfless way,  that they can restore trust in the party.

Certainly, despite the discomfort that Labour caused the Tories in the Euro vote, there is no evidence that Labour themselves believe or even hope that they can break through in 2015, whatever the polls say today.

So, the Liberal Democrats, dismissed as irrelevant or worse, are actually achieving far more than the media is giving them credit for. Despite the problems of the country, I find myself heartened by the political courage of the party's ministers. Morale in the Parliamentary party is good, and as the polls show a slight improvement in the still dire standing of the Liberal Democrats, I find myself wondering whether the party, far from being punished in 2015, might not actually end up being rewarded for at least trying to do the right thing, in the face of near-Universal derision and contempt.  


Lord Blagger said…
Yes, it is all to obvious that the physical infrastructure needs investment: but despite potential future problems, Crossrail is being built- and the tunnel portal, close to Paddington station is well underway.


Yep, and it will never make a profit.

Congratulations to the poor in Cornwall who will be paying so the rich can have subsidized travel and save 3 minutes on the commute.

We solute you suckers!
Cicero said…
With all due respect my Lord, Paris has six commuter lines, London, even after Crossrail will have two. and London is the larger city. The traffic congestion and the dangerously overloaded tube are not only degrading the environment, they are having a major negative economic impact. The investment underway is not going to improve the journey time by 3 minutes, it will be the difference between travelling and being able to make the journey at all. Starving London of necessary investment does not improve the situation in Cornwall: indeed choking the primary economic motor of the UK has a negative impact on Cornwall and everywhere else.

Popular posts from this blog

Trump and Brexit are the Pearl Harbor and the Fall of Singapore in Russia's Hybrid war against the West.

In December 1941, Imperial Japan launched a surprise attack on the United States at Pearl Harbor. After the subsequent declaration of war, within three days, the Japanese had sunk the British warships, HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse, and the rapid Japanese attack led to the surrender of Hong Kong on Christmas Day 1941 and the fall of Singapore only two months after Pearl Harbor. These were the opening blows in the long war of the Pacific that cost over 30,000,000 lives and was only ended with the detonations above Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

"History doesn't often repeat itself, but it rhymes" is an aphorism attributed to Mark Twain, and in a way it seems quite appropriate when we survey the current scene. 

In 1941, Imperial Japan, knowing its own weakness, chose a non-conventional form of war, the surprise attack. Since the end of his first Presidential term, Vladimir Putin, knowing Russia's weakness, has also chosen non-conventional ways to promote his domestic powe…

The American National nightmare becomes a global nightmare

It is a basic contention of this blog that Donald J Trump is not fit for office.

A crooked real estate developer with a dubious past and highly questionable finances. he has systematically lied his way into financial or other advantage. His personal qualities include vulgarity, sexual assault allegations and fraudulent statements on almost every subject. 

He lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes.

He has, of course, been under criminal investigation practically since before he took the oath of office. The indictment of some of closest advisers is just the beginning. His track record suggests that in due course there is no action he will not take, whether illegal or unconstitutional in order to derail his own inevitable impeachment and the indictments that must surely follow the successful investigation of Robert Mueller into his connections with Russia.

However, all of that is a matter for the American people. 

It is also a matter for the American people that Trump is cheating…

The rumbling financial markets

Security specialists use a variety of ways to address the risks that they face: and these risk assessments are made in the certain knowledge that the actors in the system hold only incomplete information. Although much mocked at the time, Donald Rumsfeld’s categorization of “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns”, is now generally recognized as a succinct summery of his strategic quandaries.
By contrast, actors in the financial markets have a more sanguine assessment of the risks they deal with: they divide them into two kinds of risk: quantifiable and unquantifiable. Unquantifiable risk is not generally considered, since there is usually no financial profit that can be made except from pure supposition. Therefore for the purposes of the financial markets, any given event is priced relative to its level of probability, that is to say its quantifiable risk. 
Depending on the market, higher levels of risk generally carry higher prices, lower levels generally lower prices. Clearly such an…