Skip to main content

What happens after a US debt default

The US Republicans are in real danger of not being able to deliver any deal at all.

There is a better than 60% chance that no deal can be done to raise the US debt ceiling before August 2nd.

In which case the US AAA debt rating is now 80% going to fall this week.

We are being constantly bombarded with the quote from the half American, Churchill: "the US always does the right thing, after it has exhausted the alternatives".

Yet, what happens if the House Republicans do not do the right thing and the United States of America defaults on its debts?

I think the enormity of that question provides its own answer.

We are seven days away from a fundamental break down in American power.

If the US defaults, it is not the same as previous crises: it will substantially and permanently degrade US standing in the world. All of the U-S-A chanting fans will be chanting for a degraded power. Those politicians who pretend that the US is an untouchable power will be seen for the frauds that they are. No longer an example, but more of a warning, the country that creates such fools as Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck will become increasingly derided.

OK so there can be no rival to the Dollar, apparently, in which case, it will be no other currency but Gold: which will shrink the global money supply by four fifths.

Oops.

The US political disfunctionalism turned out to be important after all.

Comments

Lord Blagger said…
It's not going to fall immediately.

It depends what Obama does.

Does it spend the tax revenue on debt servicing, and the remainder on government spending or vice versa?

I suspect he will carry on paying the debt.
Paul Twigg said…
Gloat all you like my dear Cicero, but the EU ain't gonna save you.

I suspect that if the US does default, followed by the realisation that the Euro-bailout is smoke and mirrors (see Germany's reaction to the latest bailout) , then as you said in previous posts we will see a re-run of the 1930s. And that means several world trade blocs, trade barriers and autarky, followed by the worst degrees of xenophobic jingoistic nationalism.

Which must send a shiver down your spine, as it does my own, being the good economic 'orange book 'liberal you are...

Whilst I understand that left- liberals hate the US, you must agree that it is better to have the dollar as the world's currency rather than that which is controlled by a group of elderly communist oligarchs in China (the alternative)?

You mention Gold as the replacement currency - not enough of it old chap and that would be too deflationary (although as a 'Euro nutter' you doubtless agree with that). Besides which the socialists and the Keynesians just wouldn't have it. Unless, of course, your advocating strip mining the asteroid belt?

ps- forget European fraternity if a dollar default happens,the EU will be the first to crack open & it would be every man (country) for himself...
Cicero said…
Paul - you missed the point, I am certainly NOT gloating. Also the point about turning to gold - it would be horribly deflationary, if transactions now have to be addressed wholly or even partly in gold, then the economy would shrink to fit the new, massively reduced money supply- and that is something that should terrify every policy maker.

It is clear to all that the US debt constitutes a grave crisis: but the Tea Party response is grossly irresponsible.
Daniel Matthews said…
http://hasamericadefaulted.com - its like that christmas website only much sadder.
Span Ows said…
No mention of Obama at all?

word verification: commi
Cicero said…
Span Ows: after the latest fiasco, it is clear that the the Republicans are making the unforced errors. Obama can not even react if the GOP can not get its act together in the house.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...