Skip to main content

Blood and oil

The murderous regime of the sinister and highly irrational Muammar Gaddafi has turned the full force of its military upon its own people. The horrific attacks on civilians have escalated the death toll into the tens of thousands. Indiscriminate brutality is the order of the day from the despot. This is a regime that has not one shred of legitimacy- it has forfited any right to govern. Yet the Libyan people apparently lack the strength to removed the hated and reviled regime.

Now Gaddafi is bombing his own oil installations, and the impact on the future of his own country is now creating a global challenge. The unrest across the Arab world is damaging the orderly market for oil and gas in a way that could undermine the prosperity not only of the Western world, but the entire world- rich and poor. If the threat of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction turned out to be a chimera, the threat of Gaddafi's oil destruction is all too real.

In the name of the Libyan people and in the interests of humanity, it must surely now be imperative that the Gaddafi regime is removed- by force if need be.

The fact is that the oil industry- upon which we still insist on placing so much reliance for our global energy needs-is not only under pressure in the Arab world. Russia- currently producing more oil than Saudi Arabia- is also highly unstable. In the past two months the country has exported over $12 billion of capital- and this capital flight, if anything, seems set to accelerate as uncertainty continues over the future political environment. Despite being the world's energy and commodity storehouse, and despite the country now, apparently, being showing the fastest growth in the number of billionaires, according to Forbes, Russia now has a truly shocking gap between the rich and the poor.

Meanwhile the definition of what the Putin regime considers to be "strategic assets" has become so wide that few if any industries remain immune to confiscation - outright theft- by the backers of the Putin regime. The latest asset grab has been in Vodka production, and even the retail sector. There is no defence against the arbitrary actions of a government not subject to the rule of law.

This is not a recipe for success, especially when we recognize how fast the poorest in Russia are dying off. All across Europe there are anecdotes of thousands of Russians seeking new homes in the West in order to escape the pressure from armed goons in the service of the Mafia-state. If anything, the situation is worse than ever before. Russia is already in a crisis.

Elsewhere, in the face of the pressure against the Saudi Royal House, the open unrest across much of the rest of the Arab world, and the civil war in Libya, it is clear that the West faces some truly dramatic and unexpected challenges. However, there is a point in the moral compass that we must not forget, and that is the initial challenge of Gaddafi to all the norms of civilisation.

If we duck the challenge he has set us, then the negative impact in the Arab world may be severe- and all the time, the clock is ticking in Russia. The 2010 oil shock may proven more severe and more long lasting than that of 1973.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and ...
1 comment
Read more

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...
20 comments
Read more

The Will of the People

Many of the most criminal political minds of the past generations have claimed to be an expression of the "will of the people"... The will of the people, that is, as interpreted by themselves. Most authoritarian rulers: Napoleon III, Mussolini, Hitler, have called referendums in order to claim some spurious popular support for the actions they had already determined upon. The problem with the June 2016 European Union was that the question was actually insufficiently clear. To leave the EU was actually a vast set of choices, not one specific choice. Danial Hannan, once of faces of Vote Leave was quite clear that leaving the EU did NOT mean leaving the Single Market:    “There is a free trade zone stretching all the way from Iceland to the Russian border. We will still be part of it after we Vote Leave.” He declared: “Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market.” The problem was that this relatively moderate position was almost immediately ...
Post a Comment
Read more