Skip to main content

The Liberal Democrats and the new media

Interesting times to be a Liberal Democrat.

One feature of the campaign that is only slowly being picked up is that the contest is shifting from the old battlefield of newspaper columns to the new battlefield of the new media: not just blogs, but Facebook and the rest of it. This is undermining a key advantage for both Labour and the Conservatives: the influence of the press. At the last election only The Independent was prepared to endorse the Liberal Democrats, while all the others endorsed to other two parties. That position seems set to be repeated. The Conservatives will gain the support of the Murdoch media, and doubtless hang on to the motley crew of the Daily Express, the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph. Labour will keep the Daily Mirror and The Guardian. None of it may make any difference.

The fact is that the old system of newspapers endorsing political parties (and often gaining knighthoods and peerages for their editors) smacks of 19th century patronage. This election has been about the dis-intermediation of politics. Where television in the 1960s impacted the political process, now it is the new media. Here, the Liberal Democrats have been fighting a highly successful insurgent campaign on such sites as Facebook- and in cyberspace you don't need to spend money on expensive newspaper and poster advertising. The money gap that benefits the Tories and Labour alike is not an issue in the new media.

I might have though that the Conservatives could have fought more effectively, after all their bloggers, such as Iain Dale, have been the market leaders over several years. Yet bloggers seem to be largely middle aged- hmm hmm- men. Twitter and Facebook is younger and more diverse. It is therefore not just the debates that have driven the surge of Lib Dem support: it is also the campaign that is being fought in cyberspace.

I don't know that the Internet campaign will be decisive, but I do think that the 2010 campaign is being more evenly fought as well as more open, as the result of these innovations. The newspapers are seeing a further nail in their coffin being hammered in by this campaign.

Comments

Newmania said…
The reason right wing opinion flocked to the internet was that it was excluded from the state broadcasting corporation. This is the largest broadcasting organization in the word and interacts with everyone of us at least once a week.

As media models go it is antediluvian and solidly behind “Progressive” opinion. Many SDP ( Now Lib Dem)members have been prominent. Polly Toynbee stood for the SDP and she was the editor of social affairs for the State telly for seven years
The list of centre left Beeb movers and shakers is a long one but when you examine the prejudices of the BBC they are more Liberal than Labour .During the so called Common Market referendum for example when much of the opposition was from the old lef the Beeb was found to have conspired with those who wanted us in. This included many Conservatives at the time but Liberals and the BBC have remained hypnotized by this big government empire when others are disillusioned

Liberal opinion has received none of the endless abuse Conservatives have and while the Guardian is nominally Labour it is as much critical of Labour from a Liberal perspective. The media is broadly inhabited by Liberals as are the arts.

The phrase Liberal establishment is a commonplace and a reality the interaction between this establishment and the Liberal Party is rather more complex.The Party contains an extremist and eccentric mix of odd bal below its smooth surface
Cicero said…
Well the Tories too contain a fair number of screwballs! Actually I think you have a point about the BBC- and the fact that the beeb sent more people to cover the leaders debate than ITV did just made me annoyed. I think Aunty Beeb needs to go on a diet and should be much better run. The golden days of David Attenborough who commissioned Monty Python, Civilisation, The Ascent of Man and many other of the best TV programmes ever made has been replaced by a bloated management producing populist crud to compete with the populist crud of ITV. I don't like the tone of the Tory attacks on the BBC, but I do admit that you have a point.
Newmania said…
YouGov daily poll - Sun Apr 18 Apr 17
LIB DEMS 33%
CONSERVATIVES 32%
LABOUR 26%


Could the Liberals get the whole anti Tory vote Labour slipping back ?Iraq up next ...bloody hell.
Cicero said…
Yes- Spectacular figures.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo