Skip to main content

The Liberal Democrats and the new media

Interesting times to be a Liberal Democrat.

One feature of the campaign that is only slowly being picked up is that the contest is shifting from the old battlefield of newspaper columns to the new battlefield of the new media: not just blogs, but Facebook and the rest of it. This is undermining a key advantage for both Labour and the Conservatives: the influence of the press. At the last election only The Independent was prepared to endorse the Liberal Democrats, while all the others endorsed to other two parties. That position seems set to be repeated. The Conservatives will gain the support of the Murdoch media, and doubtless hang on to the motley crew of the Daily Express, the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph. Labour will keep the Daily Mirror and The Guardian. None of it may make any difference.

The fact is that the old system of newspapers endorsing political parties (and often gaining knighthoods and peerages for their editors) smacks of 19th century patronage. This election has been about the dis-intermediation of politics. Where television in the 1960s impacted the political process, now it is the new media. Here, the Liberal Democrats have been fighting a highly successful insurgent campaign on such sites as Facebook- and in cyberspace you don't need to spend money on expensive newspaper and poster advertising. The money gap that benefits the Tories and Labour alike is not an issue in the new media.

I might have though that the Conservatives could have fought more effectively, after all their bloggers, such as Iain Dale, have been the market leaders over several years. Yet bloggers seem to be largely middle aged- hmm hmm- men. Twitter and Facebook is younger and more diverse. It is therefore not just the debates that have driven the surge of Lib Dem support: it is also the campaign that is being fought in cyberspace.

I don't know that the Internet campaign will be decisive, but I do think that the 2010 campaign is being more evenly fought as well as more open, as the result of these innovations. The newspapers are seeing a further nail in their coffin being hammered in by this campaign.

Comments

Newmania said…
The reason right wing opinion flocked to the internet was that it was excluded from the state broadcasting corporation. This is the largest broadcasting organization in the word and interacts with everyone of us at least once a week.

As media models go it is antediluvian and solidly behind “Progressive” opinion. Many SDP ( Now Lib Dem)members have been prominent. Polly Toynbee stood for the SDP and she was the editor of social affairs for the State telly for seven years
The list of centre left Beeb movers and shakers is a long one but when you examine the prejudices of the BBC they are more Liberal than Labour .During the so called Common Market referendum for example when much of the opposition was from the old lef the Beeb was found to have conspired with those who wanted us in. This included many Conservatives at the time but Liberals and the BBC have remained hypnotized by this big government empire when others are disillusioned

Liberal opinion has received none of the endless abuse Conservatives have and while the Guardian is nominally Labour it is as much critical of Labour from a Liberal perspective. The media is broadly inhabited by Liberals as are the arts.

The phrase Liberal establishment is a commonplace and a reality the interaction between this establishment and the Liberal Party is rather more complex.The Party contains an extremist and eccentric mix of odd bal below its smooth surface
Cicero said…
Well the Tories too contain a fair number of screwballs! Actually I think you have a point about the BBC- and the fact that the beeb sent more people to cover the leaders debate than ITV did just made me annoyed. I think Aunty Beeb needs to go on a diet and should be much better run. The golden days of David Attenborough who commissioned Monty Python, Civilisation, The Ascent of Man and many other of the best TV programmes ever made has been replaced by a bloated management producing populist crud to compete with the populist crud of ITV. I don't like the tone of the Tory attacks on the BBC, but I do admit that you have a point.
Newmania said…
YouGov daily poll - Sun Apr 18 Apr 17
LIB DEMS 33%
CONSERVATIVES 32%
LABOUR 26%


Could the Liberals get the whole anti Tory vote Labour slipping back ?Iraq up next ...bloody hell.
Cicero said…
Yes- Spectacular figures.

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

Bournemouth absence

Although I had hoped to get down to the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth this year, simple pressure of work has now made that impossible. I must admit to great disappointment. The last conference before the General Election was always likely to show a few fireworks, and indeed the conference has attracted more headlines than any other over the past three years. Some of these headlines show a significant change of course in terms of economic policy. Scepticism about the size of government expenditure has given way to concern and now it is clear that reducing government expenditure will need to be the most urgent priority of the next government. So far it has been the Liberal Democrats that have made the running, and although the Conservatives are now belatedly recognising that cuts will be required they continue to fail to provide even the slightest detail as to what they think should guide their decisions in this area. This political cowardice means that we are expected to ch