Skip to main content

The downfall of the Labour Party?

How much worse can it get for Labour?

The trend in the polls looks pretty awful for them, and there is clearly no atmosphere of peace and love in their campaign either. Judging by the ground war, Labour seem very short of money and very short of activists. There is a real chance that Labour will come third in votes already. The question that is going to be asked pretty soon is whether the scale of the Labour collapse gets so big that they start to lose a large number of seats. This asks two more questions: which seats and to which of the other two parties ? A Hung Parliament is still pretty likely - if the polls stay roughly where they are. If, however, Labour falls significantly below their current polling average of about 27%, which was thought to be pretty much their core vote, then it could get pretty catastrophic for them.

In 1997 we saw Labour elected on an unexpected and unprecedented landslide. Could 2010 see them removed in an unprecedented and unexpected obliteration? For sure Labour have not been giving the voters too many reasons to support them. For sure Gordon Brown has been graceless and uninspiring- "Women, and you are one", and other clunky howlers. Even worse though, has been the total lack of self belief. "Socialism" as an ideology has been intellectually bankrupt for at least twenty years, but the cynical and unprincipled charlatanism of the Blair "project" somehow kept the show on the road for the Labour Party. Now, with the three-ring circus of the Blair ego now gone, the light has gone out of their eyes. The zombie party could finally be facing its inevitable doom. The fact that Labour seems to have effectively been playing for a draw does not look like tactics, but more like political suicide. The Labour Party has now only got ten days to recover any ground or indeed give anyone a reason to vote for them. In fact the postal votes, which have been issued in high numbers this election, are now beginning to come back. A significant number of people have therefore already voted in large numbers for the Liberal Democrats. The door for Labour is already closing. For the Tories, the mood music is probably slightly improving, although there is increasing bitterness and rancour amongst their campaign team, as simple exhaustion sets in. Certainly I do not think that George Osborne has covered himself in glory by trying to cover the Lib Dems in the brown stuff. In terms of the popular vote, it is pretty unlikely that the Conservatives can move up very much from the low-mid thirties in the polls, but the Labour collapse might mean that the Tories could snatch a small majority.

The real work for the Liberal Democrats is now beginning. Obviously the party is seeking to maximise its vote and maximise its tally of seats in the House of Commons. The party is riding a wave of revulsion at the old style politics of the Conservatives and Labour- and the concerted smear attacks by the Tory press just shows how much George Osborne and Andy Coulson owe to Peter Mandelson and Alistair Campbell.

The Tories are hoping that the Labour collapse is small enough to essentially split the anti-Conservative vote and allow the Tories to get a majority government despite only getting a bear third of the vote. I think there would be burning resentment amongst the voters at such a result, and demands for a fairer voting system have grown ever louder through the campaign. That resentment would be fuelled further by the fact that the Tories are pledged to ignore any call for a change in the system. This election has become about who is ready to enact the real constitutional reform the country needs: it is demonstrably not the Conservatives, and the cynical partial measures proposed by Labour are too little and too late to give them any credibility.

As we lead into the last full week in the campaign, Labour are falling to bits, but despite the dirty work of their media supporters, the Tories have still not sealed the deal. There is still the chance that the Liberal Democrats can make such a strong advance that economic sense and real political reform can be the priorities of the next government, instead of the callow bromides of Cameron and Osborne.

In that sense - and most unexpectedly- the battle of the next few days will be to see whether the the Liberal Democrats can seal the deal, and take sufficient support from both Labour and the Conservatives to ensure that the agenda of reform that we propose, and which the British people generally support, can now be put into government.

UPDATE: the Labour rally just finished, Lame celebrity endorsements, Elvis endorsements and all, is such a car crash, that it is hard not to think that Labour are now in a death spiral.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...