Skip to main content

Direction of Travel

Yet another "plot" to unseat Gordon Brown before the Labour Party's date with destiny at the next general election appears to have fizzled out before even getting started. It is not hard to see why. Despite his obvious failings, both personal and political, Gordon Brown does not actually have an obvious rival. After 10 years as heir apparent to Tony Blair, Brown was elected as leader by the Labour Party unopposed.

One can argue whether the coronation of Mr. Brown ought not to have been contested, but in the end not one individual was even prepared to act as a stalking horse candidate against him. There was not even a facsimile contest. Mr. Brown's reputation for unforgiving, volcanic anger and a Stalinist devotion to destroying his enemies seems to have persuaded his colleagues that discretion was the better part of valour. The fact is that no figure has emerged who is prepared to challenge directly the failing and faltering leadership of Mr. Brown. Only Charles Clarke ploughs his solitary furrow of opposition, but he is a powerless and marginalised figure.

The failure of Hoon and Hewitt is not that they have no support- even inside the cabinet there is considerable sympathy for the idea of removing Mr. Brown- it is that they have not identified a single credible alternative who is prepared to challenge Mr. Brown directly. The various candidates said to be in the frame, from Jack Straw to David Milliband appear to be calculating that they can simply inherit the leadership of the party after an election defeat.

It is a collective failure of nerve that could be very dangerous for the Labour Party. It is clear that Mr. Brown is not temperamentally suited to being Prime Minister, yet there is no one, no one at all in the cabinet who is prepared to say so publicly and then to do something about it.

The consequences could be a spectacular, rather than a merely heavy, defeat. Labour flirted with annihilation in 1983, because they would not axe Michael Foot. Can it be that Labour are going to make the same mistake twice. With the lowest polls for Labour at only 23%- behind the Liberal Democrats- might it be that this failure of nerve in the cabinet brings truly epochal changes to British Politics- including the eclipse of Labour as a governing party?

"Whom the Gods would destroy, they first make mad"

Comments

Newmania said…
Preparing for government are you ? Well I must admit it is a less absurd posture now than I can ever remember it being.
Bernard Salmon said…
It wasn't quite true that there was no-one willing to challenge Brown in 2007 - John MacDonnell tried, but was unable to secure sufficient nominations, owing to the craven and career-minded Labour sheep nominating Brown en bloc.

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo