Skip to main content

Darling's Double Dip Disaster

The UK has released the latest GDP numbers: on 40% of the data, the statistics show that the British economy finally returned to growth... of 0.1%. The consensus forecast was for 0.4%, so there is no doubt that these growth numbers are disappointing, and there is still the scope for them to be revised downwards. Meanwhile next months numbers are likely to be worse, given the slowdown in retail spending that the increase in VAT is likely to bring about.

So it may be that the British economy has not even come out of recession, and even if it has, it may go back into negative territory at the next data point.

This comes despite the fact that the British government is continuing to run a double digit deficit; A deficit that is not sustainable and which must be reduced sharply. The fact is that those who are seeking to put a positive gloss on the situation of the British economy are missing the point: the country has still not escaped from its fool's paradise where property is always a one way bet and that it is legitimate to borrow as much as possible at today's "low rates" in order to get on the property escalator for the future.

However, the rapid increase in inflation is not just a function of base effects: the whole structure of the British economy is now paying the price for the devaluation of Sterling over the past two years. The Bank of England is signalling that it will not increase rates even if the inflation numbers over the next two quarters are worse than expected. The Bank is trying to avoid the blame for tipping the economy back into recession by raising rates too soon.

Yet all that is happening is that the low rate environment is keeping the UK housing market at an unsustainable peak. The imbalances of the British economy can not be corrected while House Prices are 20% above any sustainable level. As CQS observes in their latest briefing: the outlook is for considerable turbulence in the UK economy.

The risk that the Bank of England runs be keeping rates low is that the erosion of Sterling that high inflation causes becomes a collapse in confidence in the currency.

As I have noted before, the choice is stark: either keep rates low and risk a Sterling collapse or increase them and trigger a house price fall, with a risk of further problems in the banking sector. For the time being, the market believes that the Bank of England will have to raise rates quite soon. If they are disappointed then there is a real risk that the Pound becomes permanently dislocated from its previous trading range and drops to parity with the Euro, or even below.

There is a certain amount of patience still in the market, because the expectation is that a new government will take effective action against the deficit, but the UK is running out of road. If, despite the massive deficit spending, the double dip actually happens, then the policy choices are all very unpleasant indeed. The government after the next election may find that it has to make pro-cyclical cuts in government expenditure even though the economy has returned to recession. Under those circumstances the longest recession since 1945 which we have supposedly just emerged from will look like a phony recession: the impact of Great Recession II will involve the painful restructuring that the Brown government tried to avoid and it will be all the worse for having been delayed. The imbalances in Housing may finally be addressed, but the consequences for millions of mortgage payers will not be pretty.

So, it is not a wonder that there are growing mutterings about the outlook for the British economy over the next few years: and those mutterings could become a roar quite soon. The day of reckoning will come very soon unless there is real leadership at the Treasury and the Bank of England.

Comments

Newmania said…
Now I wish you stuck to what you know ,this is really good .

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo