Skip to main content

The strange death of Labour England

The credit crisis is continuing to descend into a prolonged depression. Ireland now faces a crisis that is so severe that it is now facing the real possibility that it cannot finance its own debts without major assistance from the rest of the European Union.

Meanwhile in the UK, the nearly 40% devaluation of Sterling may cushion some of the blow, but the implosion of such a huge part of the financial sector in an economy dominated by financial services has clearly been a body blow to the future prosperity of Britain.

In the face of the escalating collapse, the previous slogans of Gordon Brown: "An end to boom and bust", "prudence with a purpose" and so on are now revealed as empty air. Despite the initial burst of activity, the current government response has also been revealed as equally threadbare. Despite every attempt, the Labour government is still sinking deep into the mire.

The return of Peter Mandelson with his trailing miasma of sleezy and unprincipled politics has only served to underline the scale of the crisis, both personal and political that is engulfing the British Prime Minister. As rumours grow of his failing eye-sight the atmosphere around number 10 Downing Street increasingly resembles that of the court of King Lear.

Internationally it has become the conventional wisdom that the "British model" has failed, and even our allies have ceased to be polite to a government that they increasingly regard as finished.

The news for the Labour Party is now extremely bleak. While they continue to retain strong footholds in Scotland and Wales, in many parts of England the greater part of their support in some areas has disappeared completely. The latest run of opinion polls suggest that Labour are facing extinction in the South and risk losing a great belt of seats across the marginal Midlands and in even the north.

Yet these same polls do not show enthusiasm for the Conservatives- although they are managing to keep their poll ratings above the critical 40% mark, deeper analysis of the polling numbers still make for dismaying reading for Conservative strategists: the Conservative support remains soft, and the electorate still seems to doubt Tory skills in the vital area of economic competence.

The Labour party could now be facing the moment of truth. It seems quite possible that a significant chunk of Labour support is leaking over, not just to the Conservatives but also to the Liberal Democrats. The recovery of the Liberal Democrats to levels of around 22% could be potentially devastating for Labour. Were the Lib Dems to start an election campaign at that sort of level, then if they match their traditional increase over the campaign, then they could, not only out poll their previous percentages, but also catch Labour in a fatal pincer that would remove them from power and potentially destroy them as a governing force.

Comments

Newmania said…
Calm down dear.... The man from You Gov he says no

CONSERVATIVES 44% (+1)
LABOUR 32% (nc)
LIB DEMS 14% (-2)

And the online pollster has the LDs going down......

Given that LD votes are usually protest votes if this poll is right we are looking at the end of the LD`s.
J said…
"Yet these same polls do not show enthusiasm for the Conservatives- although they are managing to keep their poll ratings above the critical 40% mark, deeper analysis of the polling numbers still make for dismaying reading for Conservative strategists: the Conservative support remains soft, and the electorate still seems to doubt Tory skills in the vital area of economic competence."

Utterly irrelevant. Major/Clarke led Blair/Brown in economic competence at the 1997 election. Subsidiary questions don't matter: what matters is how many Xs go in each box.
Dave H said…
The Lib Dems need substantially more votes than Labour to get more MPs than Labour.

The media reacts to the parties strengths in the Commons rather than in the country, so the Lib Dems merely getting more votes than Labour will not be enough to destroy Labour as a governing force. (And if such a situation did come to pass, the Conservatives would have a more dominant Parliamentary position than Labour had from 1997-2005.)
Manfarang said…
Newmania's poll was of course taken at the Conservative HQ.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...