Skip to main content

Deflation, Inflation, Reflation

While I suppose I should be writing ponderous sentences about the importance of inauguration day, the fact is that it will be many hours before we can judge Barack Obama's speech and on a perfect day to bury bad news there is a great deal of bad news.

The latest inflation numbers, although above expectations still show a sharp fall and the trend is now firmly downwards. the problem is that the trend is so firmly downwards that it looks pretty likely that there will be several months of deflation later in the year. Such deflation is a measure of the scale of the bust which is now only beginning to afflict the wider economy. Depression 2.0 will be long and deep. Those confidently forecasting recovery in 2010 may simply be whistling in the dark.

Deflation is incredibly damaging to peoples well being: it undermines the whole economic mechanism because the time value of money becomes negative. Governments will do almost anything to avoid it. What the British government now seems that it will have to do is take on the liabilities of the Banking system directly. The renewed instability in the financial markets reflects the fact that the government- as Vince Cable predicted- has already lost the bulk of the first £37 billion. Nationalisation of RBS seems all but certain and the UK will need to take on a substantial open ended liability.

Of course the UK is not alone- despite the negative comments coming from such figures as Jim Rogers: "the UK is finished". Spain, Greece, Italy, and several other Eurozone economies are facing the need to take on giant sums of debt in order to stabilise their positions. Ireland has even warned that with out support from the other Eurozone economies (i.e. Germany) it may have to default. Dublin has now had to nationalise all of its top three banks.

It now seems quite clear that governments, in order to stave off the hard place of deflation will instead steer their economies onto the rocks of inflation. Inflation will reduce the level of indebtedness to manageable levels. That it will also destroy the savings sector is simply collateral damage- since after the 1970s, Governments believe that they can deal far more easily with the consequences of inflation than deflation.

Debouching the value of money is nevertheless a gigantic failure of any government. The consequences may be far more problematic than policymakers now think. In my opinion it would be the final nail in the coffin of Sterling and may compel British entry into the Euro on highly unfavourable terms- if we are lucky.

Yet the counter argument is that if all governments follow an inflationary policy at the same time, then the relative damage may not be so bad. Nevertheless there is a money beyond control of governments: gold.

Mr. Obama does not have so much room for manoeuvre, and the price of gold will demonstrate the level of confidence that investors are still prepared to show towards the greenback- and every other vandalised and inflated currency.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...