Skip to main content

Are we in the prelude to a global war?

In his recently published book, Bill Browder gives estimates of how much Vladimir Putin has stolen from his Russian fellow countrymen. The number he gives is a truly staggering $200 billion. If this is even remotely true, it makes Putin one of the greatest thieves in human history. 

We already know that Putin is presiding over a propaganda machine that rivals and even exceeds the worst that Josef Goebbels presided over. The use of propaganda is sophisticated and relativistic- Peter Pomerantsev in his book "Nothing is True and Everything is Possible" outlines just how pervasive and evil the Putinist lie machine has become.

In the UK, the inquiry into the circumstances of the poisoning of Aleksander Litvinenko has revealed that the British government has clear and direct evidence that Russian government agents acting under the orders of "the highest authority" carried out the murder of Litvinenko, even though he was a British citizen, and the murder was carried out in the heart of the British capital. An act of murder that was intended to be an act of intimidation and revenge.

That Vladimir Putin is a warmonger is pretty much self evident. At his order, Russia has conducted open military operations against Moldova, Chechnya, Georgia and now, of course, Ukraine. Russian forces have been implicated in other conflicts- including in Armenia, Tajikistan, Kygyzstan Iraq and elsewhere.

A thief, a liar, a murderer, a warmonger. It is already an infamous record.

Yet worse seems certain to come.

Famously Vladimir Putin was assessed by his KGB handlers as having a reduced sense of danger. This sense of recklessness is allied to a ruthless perception of his own interests. He has not hesitated to use murder to achieve his goals. 

The agreement that Francois Hollande and Angela Merkel thought they had negotiated in Minsk has clearly failed. Far from halting the fighting, the Russian army has expanded its rearmament in Ukraine and forced the Ukrainian army to withdraw further, not just from Debaltseve, but now from Mariupol. Putin has continued to act in bad faith, even to the leaders of the peacemaking process.


There is now a consistent pattern of aggression and hostility from the Putinist regime. A pattern of bad faith and dishonour. There can be no doubt about what we are facing, and also little doubt that Russia, hostile and heavily rearmed, with troops practicing conventional and nuclear attacks against NATO is now a threat to democracy and freedom around the world. 

I believe the evidence is now quite clear that Putin intends to expand his war against the West and its values. He will not back down, and he will not stop, unless he is stopped. 

The failure, indeed the humiliation, of President Hollande and Chancellor Merkel in the face of the hostile intent of the Russian tyrant indicates that Russia no longer cares about what Europe thinks. The implication is that Putin is now prepared to launch open attacks directly against the West and particularly NATO.

The crisis is about to head into a far more dangerous direction. In fact, unless we arm Ukraine sufficiently to tie down Russian forces we could be facing a direct attack within weeks which will lead to a European or even a global conflict.

Vladimir Putin is already one of the greatest mafia dons- a proven liar, a proven thief on an historic scale, the author of state-sponsored murder. Some might say that his crimes- even his wars- are still on a small scale, yet in an afternoon a Putin ordered nuclear attack would make him the greatest murderer in human history too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and ...

The Will of the People

Many of the most criminal political minds of the past generations have claimed to be an expression of the "will of the people"... The will of the people, that is, as interpreted by themselves. Most authoritarian rulers: Napoleon III, Mussolini, Hitler, have called referendums in order to claim some spurious popular support for the actions they had already determined upon. The problem with the June 2016 European Union was that the question was actually insufficiently clear. To leave the EU was actually a vast set of choices, not one specific choice. Danial Hannan, once of faces of Vote Leave was quite clear that leaving the EU did NOT mean leaving the Single Market:    “There is a free trade zone stretching all the way from Iceland to the Russian border. We will still be part of it after we Vote Leave.” He declared: “Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market.” The problem was that this relatively moderate position was almost immediately ...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...