Skip to main content

Liberal Democrats: We are not dead yet




As the rumbles of the Euro-massacre continue with mutinous mutterings across the Liberal Democrats, it is worth stepping back and thinking about where were could realistically recover to in the course of the next few weeks and months, and, post the general election election in May 2015, years 
Personally I think that the difficulties of changing leader are so large, and the probable benefits so marginal, because of the damage that it would cause, that it is simply not worth it.
So what should we do instead?
I agree we absolutely need to refocus and to change our way of doing things, but to be honest the false hope that people are investing in a coup de partie against Nick is arguably a substitute for dealing with the real problem of how we have failed to set the political weather at the outset of the coalition, especially because we were outplayed on AV and tuition fees, and how trashed the Party image now is. A civil war will make things much worse, not better.
Meanwhile, our belief in real constitutional reform in the UK is going to get very topical after the Scottish referendum, I think we should propose a British convention to address the corruption of safe seats, the democratic deficit, the nonsense of the House of Lords and all the rest, not to mention greater home rule for Scotland, Wales and of course speaking up for Home Rule for England in a new federal UK. In the eyes of the voters "politics as usual" is the problem, and few understand how radical we are in opposing that. It is pro-active, positive and principled to do this. More than that, it might even strike a chord with the jaded and volatile voting public. 

We need to attack the insane UK tax code, which at nearly 12,000 pages is one of the longest in the world and which mostly exists to reduce the burden on the rich and increase it on the poor. There is genuine anger at how unwieldy and expensive it is, even for the most basic tax payer, to comply with the rules. Radical tax reform is an idea whose time is overdue, and we can lead that rebellion.

Benefits reform- the integration of tax and benefits especially- should be part of the simplification and if the rules become more transparent, then again this can be a popular policy. Steve Webb's measures on pensions will ultimately have huge positive benefits, we should shout about it.

And by the way, these are policies we already have adopted in great detail. We just need to sell them!

The problem is that in trying to defend the coalition, we are fighting the battles of the past, not the future. We should spend the next year saying what we need to do next and barely mentioning the coalition at all. We need to talk about the future and why our ideas are not merely relevant, but essential.

We are not dead yet. But we might be, unless we look to the future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cicero ReDux

By Special Request of Baroness Scott and Mark Valladares... Cicero's Songs returns: bigger, longer and uncut.
October 1st marked the half way point of the Estonian Presidency of the European Union.  Perhaps for many people such an anniversary is of passing interest at best.  Yet the conduct of the Estonian Presidency is reinforcing just how forward looking and innovative the most northerly of the Baltic States has become.
Estonia is a country that wants to live in the future, and with its openness and innovation, that future seems a lot closer than almost anywhere else in Europe
It is not that Estonia does not “do” the past: the picturesque cobbled streets of old Tallinn have tourist crowds a-plenty enjoying the mediaeval architecture in an Indian summer of sunshine and blue skies.  The real point is that Estonia refuses to be a prisoner of its past. Lennart Meri, Estonia’s President in the 1990s- who spent years of his childhood in Siberia- once told me that the country had to conc…

The American National nightmare becomes a global nightmare

It is a basic contention of this blog that Donald J Trump is not fit for office.

A crooked real estate developer with a dubious past and highly questionable finances. he has systematically lied his way into financial or other advantage. His personal qualities include vulgarity, sexual assault allegations and fraudulent statements on almost every subject. 

He lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes.

He has, of course, been under criminal investigation practically since before he took the oath of office. The indictment of some of closest advisers is just the beginning. His track record suggests that in due course there is no action he will not take, whether illegal or unconstitutional in order to derail his own inevitable impeachment and the indictments that must surely follow the successful investigation of Robert Mueller into his connections with Russia.

However, all of that is a matter for the American people. 

It is also a matter for the American people that Trump is cheating…

In praise of off-shore tax havens

The last few years has seen a spate of "scandals" about the use of off-shore tax havens. The hacking and subsequent leaking of data about who does and does not hold assets in off-shore jurisdictions has become an old perennial in the British press, rather like the "COLD weather happens in winter and QUITE HOT weather happens in summer", whose alarmist capital letter laced headlines are such a lazy part of contemporary "journalism". 

The increasing sophistication of the hackers, whether Russian-inspired or not, has resulted in a steady trickle of information becoming a torrent. After the relatively filleted release of data in the so-called "Panama Papers", the data release of the "Paradise Papers" is even larger.  Of course, just natural curiosity dictates that the off-shore ownership, or even just "ownership", of assets is of general public interest.  Celebrities, from the Royal family to the cast of Mrs Brown's Boys, are …