Skip to main content

Those that live by the Sword

A whistle-stop trip back to Scotland has somewhat placed into context the crisis that Vladimir Putin has unleashed upon Europe and the world. 

As military units are hurriedly scrambled into position in NATO member states, it becomes clear that Russia is merely waiting in order to unleash further aggression on Ukraine. Whether that comes in a few days, a few weeks or even a few months, the idea of a free and democratic Ukraine is as repellent to Putin as a free and democratic Russia. The crushing of all free media, all opposition points of view and even the slightest dissent in Russia has proceeded, it is now all too clear that Putin's contempt for freedom is absolute. He is openly dismissive of all Western democratic values which, in an eerie echo of Fascism, he regards as "decadent".

Like Adolf Hitler in the 1930s, he has turned his tyranny abroad as well as at home. His unprovoked aggression against Ukraine breaks all treaties and all the norms of international law. Across the entire planet, it is clear that Russia is now a pariah state. Putin is a barbarian who rules a criminal regime. There can be no compromise with him, no deals that he will honour, no respect that he will give us. He is an outright enemy of democracy, tolerance and freedom.

Yet this Adolf Hitler tribute act is in many ways a pale parody of Fascism. For example, Hitler had great power allies: Mussolini's Italy and Japan in the Pact of Steel and more dangerously even Stalin in the Nazi-Soviet pact. Putin has Belarus, Armenia, Venezuela, Bolivia, North Korea, Sudan, Nicaragua, Cuba, Syria and Zimbabwe- all even more poor, corrupt and brutal than Russia itself. 

The great Russian hope of China has stayed studiously neutral, while nonetheless making very public gestures to support the system of international law which has helped them trade their way to riches and which Putin has so savagely trashed.

Now it is clear that the situation in Crimea itself grows ever more unstable as anger grows over the wholesale theft that the Russian occupiers have engaged in. The Crimean Tatars loathe Russia and are preparing a determined resistance. The failure of Russian agents provocateurs in Eastern Ukraine is growing more embarrassing.

More to the point, global disgust and anger at Russian intransigent arrogance has left investors rushing for the exit and this, more than the relatively weak sanctions imposed so far, is ripping the heart out of the Russian economy. Russia has no rule of law- inside or outside its borders- and this renders all deals, not merely diplomatic ones, utterly worthless.

The investment gap for 2014, which already looked quite wide, now looks unbridgeable, and the consequence for this and subsequent years will be a deep recession. Who would invest in Russia now? It offers only a collapsing infrastructure, lousy demographics, no investor protection, no growth, and industrial scale crime. The supposed assets have all been stolen by Putin and his henchmen.

I have often said that Vladimir Putin has recreated Czarism: "Autocracy, mitigated by assassination". Now the warped personality of the Russian leader is set to put his country into a very dark place. I do not know if Russia can survive the authoritarian criminality of late Putinism. Only a moral renewal like Germany after 1946, or South Africa after 1989 can even avert the disaster that Putin is unleashing on his country. 

Until the Russian people can recover the right to rule themselves, the rest of the Planet has a right -indeed a duty- to defend itself. Even in Ukraine, which seems so defenceless now, there is a determination to leave free lives- and that is a virus that will ultimately infect Russia and destroy the criminals in the Kremlin. 

In the end it is all about Freedom. The Putin regime is an enemy of Freedom and must be resisted until that regime is gone and a freer wind blows in Moscow. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...