Skip to main content

Morality and Humbug

I am not sure whether or not the UK can blame a general moral collapse for the riots that convulsed the country in early August, although that is what Prime Minister Cameron appears to believe.

I am, however, pretty sure that any comments about morality from Tony Blair should be treated with disdain, if not actual contempt.

As Peter Mandelson helps himself to the point where he can now afford an £8 million house, and Mr. Blair himself continues to collect ever larger cheques from various international investment banks, it seems pretty clear to me that at least two of the new Labour triumvirate have parleyed their public service into private profit.

Mandelson, of course, was a notably indifferent minister, being forced to resign on two separate occasions for reasons directly concerned with a rather careless attitude to money. It remains to be seen how history will judge Mr. Blair, but given the aftermath of his policies in Iraq and the economic catastrophe that hit the UK shortly after Mr. Blair departed from office, it is hard to see how that judgement will be particularly positive.

What I find most revolting is the nakedness of the greed of these erstwhile public servants. They are filling their boots by working for institutions that themselves have a pretty questionable view of morality. As it is revealed that students are being put off entering the City because of the stigma banking is now getting, I also note that John Le Carre has highlighted this issue in his latest novel, "Our Kind of Traitor".

Perhaps more interestingly there are barely disguised references to the Mandelson /Osborne /Deripaska affair. Those controversial meetings that took place then, must- we hope- have had a less sinister intent than the fictional meetings on a similar yacht.

Whatever happened in the riots, the idea that morality prevails unsullied in British politics is not one that John Le Carre shares, and -as I have noted before- Russian money in Britain is indeed being used for purposes that undermine our own freedom.

Any politician who promoted such business would certainly be involved in activity that, if not actually illegal, would most certainly be immoral.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
The problem is less that Mandelson was 'a notoriously indifferent minister' - the problem was, and remains for Labour, that in spite of everything he was still ten times the politician and minister of the rest of Gordon Brown's cabinet put together.
10:41 am
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and ...
1 comment
Read more

The Will of the People

Many of the most criminal political minds of the past generations have claimed to be an expression of the "will of the people"... The will of the people, that is, as interpreted by themselves. Most authoritarian rulers: Napoleon III, Mussolini, Hitler, have called referendums in order to claim some spurious popular support for the actions they had already determined upon. The problem with the June 2016 European Union was that the question was actually insufficiently clear. To leave the EU was actually a vast set of choices, not one specific choice. Danial Hannan, once of faces of Vote Leave was quite clear that leaving the EU did NOT mean leaving the Single Market:    “There is a free trade zone stretching all the way from Iceland to the Russian border. We will still be part of it after we Vote Leave.” He declared: “Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market.” The problem was that this relatively moderate position was almost immediately ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...
20 comments
Read more