Skip to main content

Greek Tragedy: German Crisis

In the face of the growing crisis in Athens, it would be as well to remember that this is as much a crisis of Germany as it is of Greece.

If Greece is to be rescued, the German taxpayer will be forced to find the money.

Yet if Greece is not rescued, it is the German banks that are first in line to take the losses, and again it will be the German taxpayer that will have to pick up the bill.

Meanwhile, if Greece is left to its fate, then Germany will have to carry the opprobrium for breaking down European solidarity: it will show once and for all that Germany will indeed put its perceived national interest above that of the wider European Union, which pretty much ends the idea of Germany signing up to ever closer union. In other words it would be a major change in German policy towards the EU- and if it were to be changed, there could be some widespread and unexpected changes in other countries policies towards Germany. There are some potential significant foreign policy risks for Berlin here.

Yet, it is for precisely this reason that the Germans may decide to take a step towards the transfer union that is potentially risky internal ground for the Merkel government. The German constitutional court has made it plain that there is a limit to the financial support that the German treasury can give, and, more to the point, there is a limit to the level of sovereignty that can be pooled. So a European Treasury would very probably be vetoed by the German constitutional court. This is why the ideas of permanent capital backing of government bonds in the Euro zone has been expressed in such nebulous terms: a "transfer union" might be politically unpopular in Germany, but it would probably be OK with the Court. So, in addition to calculations of foreign policy, the German Chancellor has also to make some fine judgments on domestic policy too.

Yet in one area Mrs. Merkel has already tripped up. By delaying discussions on the problems of private sector firms in the financial sector until after the government crisis has been addressed, she shows that she does not understand the interconnected nature of the crisis. The issue is not whether the problems of state liquidity and structural reform take precedence over those of the private sector: it is how to address the general crisis of over-leverage. It seems frankly outrageous that taxpayers are being penalized in order to payout a full return to the shareholders of the banks. Yet by separating the public and private sector restructuring, that is precisely what is set to happen, not just in Greece, but across the Euro zone.

The calls for a default and an exit from the Euro by Greece- mostly from die-hard anti-Euro commentators- miss the point. It is indeed already obvious that Greece must dramatically reduce its debt burden, but an exit from the Euro would not only lead to a crisis of confidence in Greece. In any event securing support for a New Drachma would be exceptionally difficult, and would still leave the Greek government owing a vast sum of Euros- it does not solve Greek problems, which can now only be addressed by a major restructuring anyway. What it could do is force other states out the Euro. Essentially that would been a major devaluation by several significant markets for German goods.

In other words the break-up of the Euro zone is also a significant crisis for Germany. Not only would the Germans get the blame, but they would now face much greater competition and a significant reduction in export earnings too. The German competitive advantage, arrived at with the pain of restructuring may now be over, as other countries face up to a period of spectacular instability and are forced to match or better the efficiency of Germany. Indeed whatever happens, the German competitive advantage must erode, or else the unbalanced Euro economy will enter a still greater crisis. Yet how to sell this to the German electorate?

So, as the Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou sweats through the passage of legislation and struggles to restructure his government in the face of a fierce blast of protest, it is not just in Athens that nerves are fraying.

In Berlin the lights are also burning late into the night. Germany too is facing its moment of truth.


G Eagle Esq said…
Sehr interessant

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

Bournemouth absence

Although I had hoped to get down to the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth this year, simple pressure of work has now made that impossible. I must admit to great disappointment. The last conference before the General Election was always likely to show a few fireworks, and indeed the conference has attracted more headlines than any other over the past three years. Some of these headlines show a significant change of course in terms of economic policy. Scepticism about the size of government expenditure has given way to concern and now it is clear that reducing government expenditure will need to be the most urgent priority of the next government. So far it has been the Liberal Democrats that have made the running, and although the Conservatives are now belatedly recognising that cuts will be required they continue to fail to provide even the slightest detail as to what they think should guide their decisions in this area. This political cowardice means that we are expected to ch