Skip to main content

Greek Tragedy: German Crisis

In the face of the growing crisis in Athens, it would be as well to remember that this is as much a crisis of Germany as it is of Greece.

If Greece is to be rescued, the German taxpayer will be forced to find the money.

Yet if Greece is not rescued, it is the German banks that are first in line to take the losses, and again it will be the German taxpayer that will have to pick up the bill.

Meanwhile, if Greece is left to its fate, then Germany will have to carry the opprobrium for breaking down European solidarity: it will show once and for all that Germany will indeed put its perceived national interest above that of the wider European Union, which pretty much ends the idea of Germany signing up to ever closer union. In other words it would be a major change in German policy towards the EU- and if it were to be changed, there could be some widespread and unexpected changes in other countries policies towards Germany. There are some potential significant foreign policy risks for Berlin here.

Yet, it is for precisely this reason that the Germans may decide to take a step towards the transfer union that is potentially risky internal ground for the Merkel government. The German constitutional court has made it plain that there is a limit to the financial support that the German treasury can give, and, more to the point, there is a limit to the level of sovereignty that can be pooled. So a European Treasury would very probably be vetoed by the German constitutional court. This is why the ideas of permanent capital backing of government bonds in the Euro zone has been expressed in such nebulous terms: a "transfer union" might be politically unpopular in Germany, but it would probably be OK with the Court. So, in addition to calculations of foreign policy, the German Chancellor has also to make some fine judgments on domestic policy too.

Yet in one area Mrs. Merkel has already tripped up. By delaying discussions on the problems of private sector firms in the financial sector until after the government crisis has been addressed, she shows that she does not understand the interconnected nature of the crisis. The issue is not whether the problems of state liquidity and structural reform take precedence over those of the private sector: it is how to address the general crisis of over-leverage. It seems frankly outrageous that taxpayers are being penalized in order to payout a full return to the shareholders of the banks. Yet by separating the public and private sector restructuring, that is precisely what is set to happen, not just in Greece, but across the Euro zone.

The calls for a default and an exit from the Euro by Greece- mostly from die-hard anti-Euro commentators- miss the point. It is indeed already obvious that Greece must dramatically reduce its debt burden, but an exit from the Euro would not only lead to a crisis of confidence in Greece. In any event securing support for a New Drachma would be exceptionally difficult, and would still leave the Greek government owing a vast sum of Euros- it does not solve Greek problems, which can now only be addressed by a major restructuring anyway. What it could do is force other states out the Euro. Essentially that would been a major devaluation by several significant markets for German goods.

In other words the break-up of the Euro zone is also a significant crisis for Germany. Not only would the Germans get the blame, but they would now face much greater competition and a significant reduction in export earnings too. The German competitive advantage, arrived at with the pain of restructuring may now be over, as other countries face up to a period of spectacular instability and are forced to match or better the efficiency of Germany. Indeed whatever happens, the German competitive advantage must erode, or else the unbalanced Euro economy will enter a still greater crisis. Yet how to sell this to the German electorate?

So, as the Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou sweats through the passage of legislation and struggles to restructure his government in the face of a fierce blast of protest, it is not just in Athens that nerves are fraying.

In Berlin the lights are also burning late into the night. Germany too is facing its moment of truth.

Comments

G Eagle Esq said…
Sehr interessant

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...