Skip to main content

True Finns, UKIP and the shape of British politics

Most political journalists in the UK are looking for a story of the break up of the Liberal Democrat-Conservative coalition. Any spat between the two parties is examined to see if it poses a terminal challenge to the government itself. Of course there are disputes, but the surprising thing is that the disputes between the two parties remain less numerous and less rancorous than the disputes between members of the single-party Labour government. Indeed, because the two parties do not expect to agree on everything, so a certain amount of live-and-let-live is inevitable.

However, there is an emerging threat to this generally courteous and professional relationship. It is not that there are fundamental disagreements over such issues as the NHS- although there are. Neither is it because of David Cameron's determined leadership of the No-to-AV campaign. It is not even because the Conservatives are focusing on a numbers game in immigration, although that is in the view of many Liberal Democrats- not least Vince Cable- completely counter productive to a disciplined and organised immigration policy. No, the emerging problem is outside the coalition.

The remarkable surge in the support for the nationalist, Euro-sceptic, True Finns in the Finnish General election is reminding some political observers that Britain too has a significant Euro-sceptic party, the shape of UKIP. Thus far, UKIP has only been able to achieve success in the European elections. It has yet to gain significant numbers of councillors, and it has no MPs, MSPs or AMs. Yet, the latest opinion polls, ahead of the local elections in May, show a significant growth in support for Other parties- some of this is clearly an uptick in the nationalist parties, the SNP and Plaid Cymru, but it may also reflect a growth in support for UKIP. Such a growth would certainly inflame those on the Tory right who have never supported the coalition.

The question is whether the Conservatives would lurch to the right, in a bid to crush a potential insurgency from UKIP, or whether they would maintain the relationship with the Liberal Democrats. From the point of view of political journalism, the temptation would probably to highlight the "threat" from UKIP, particularly if the switch to AV was supported by the referendum. On the other hand, expectations for the Liberal Democrats are now so low that even survival as a force in local government will be seen as an achievement. Yet, it may indeed be that Labour have overplayed their hand, and their breathtakingly patronizing campaign, which seeks to suggest that Lib Dems are "really" Labour voters anyway, may yet reprieve the junior coalition party. The question then will be more complicated than a straight swing to Labour, but different messages from different parts of the country.

In fact I expect that there will be a very mixed message from the different local and national elections, and one that the coalition as a whole may find reassuring. Labour may not find the going in Scotland entirely to their liking, although I fear that the Lib Dems will be most badly heart north of the border. Elsewhere, any progress for UKIP will be interpreted as a threat to the coalition, although even under AV, UKIP will probably toil to gain a single Westminster seat.

The True Finns may take some of their inspiration from UKIP, but even a few Council gains will not put UKIP in the same league as their Finnish colleagues. The real battle remains between the coalition and Labour- and Labour may not get things all their own way.

Comments

neil craig said…
Remember that UKIP placed 2nd at the last EU election. They clearly have a lot of potential support and being the "not our fault, we haven't lied to you like they did" party, which Clegg played so hard in the last election, but obviously can't now, should do them a lot of good.

The real problem UKIP face is that the state broadcasting compay, while legally commoitted to balance, censors and lies at every opportunity to support the 3 "official" parties and theur Green friends. This may become more difficult as UKIP votes grow.

At what point do Conservative party members acknowledge that Cameron is a lying eco-fascist big government EU supporting parasitic Blair-lite and get rid of him?

Popular posts from this blog

Cicero ReDux

By Special Request of Baroness Scott and Mark Valladares... Cicero's Songs returns: bigger, longer and uncut.
October 1st marked the half way point of the Estonian Presidency of the European Union.  Perhaps for many people such an anniversary is of passing interest at best.  Yet the conduct of the Estonian Presidency is reinforcing just how forward looking and innovative the most northerly of the Baltic States has become.
Estonia is a country that wants to live in the future, and with its openness and innovation, that future seems a lot closer than almost anywhere else in Europe
It is not that Estonia does not “do” the past: the picturesque cobbled streets of old Tallinn have tourist crowds a-plenty enjoying the mediaeval architecture in an Indian summer of sunshine and blue skies.  The real point is that Estonia refuses to be a prisoner of its past. Lennart Meri, Estonia’s President in the 1990s- who spent years of his childhood in Siberia- once told me that the country had to conc…

The American National nightmare becomes a global nightmare

It is a basic contention of this blog that Donald J Trump is not fit for office.

A crooked real estate developer with a dubious past and highly questionable finances. he has systematically lied his way into financial or other advantage. His personal qualities include vulgarity, sexual assault allegations and fraudulent statements on almost every subject. 

He lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes.

He has, of course, been under criminal investigation practically since before he took the oath of office. The indictment of some of closest advisers is just the beginning. His track record suggests that in due course there is no action he will not take, whether illegal or unconstitutional in order to derail his own inevitable impeachment and the indictments that must surely follow the successful investigation of Robert Mueller into his connections with Russia.

However, all of that is a matter for the American people. 

It is also a matter for the American people that Trump is cheating…

In praise of off-shore tax havens

The last few years has seen a spate of "scandals" about the use of off-shore tax havens. The hacking and subsequent leaking of data about who does and does not hold assets in off-shore jurisdictions has become an old perennial in the British press, rather like the "COLD weather happens in winter and QUITE HOT weather happens in summer", whose alarmist capital letter laced headlines are such a lazy part of contemporary "journalism". 

The increasing sophistication of the hackers, whether Russian-inspired or not, has resulted in a steady trickle of information becoming a torrent. After the relatively filleted release of data in the so-called "Panama Papers", the data release of the "Paradise Papers" is even larger.  Of course, just natural curiosity dictates that the off-shore ownership, or even just "ownership", of assets is of general public interest.  Celebrities, from the Royal family to the cast of Mrs Brown's Boys, are …