Skip to main content

Hussein Obama faces the birthers

I see that 18% of Americans apparently believe Barrack Obama is a Muslim.

Frankly it just shows that in the hate filled world of the radical American right, if you tell a lie big enough, for long enough, it will end up being believed. These are many of the the same people who insist that Obama was not a native born American, and therefore an unconstitutional President- the "birthers".

The certainty and the spittle flecked hatred with which these people express their views, for which there is not one scintilla of evidence, is truly extraordinary. It is not one step from Fascism.

It is Fascism.

That is extremely worrying for those of us who like and admire so much about the USA.

In the face of the administration mis-steps: calling allies "partners" not "allies"; failing to inform, still less consult those NATO allies on critical decisions; treading quite firmly on British toes over the Falkland Islands, BP and a range of other issues, it is clear that the atmosphere is Washington DC is rather febrile at the moment.

However, for all the mistakes of the incumbent administration, the "birthers" and other extreme manifestations of the "tea party" movement are a far greater concern.

The decline of the European powers in the face of the rise of the United States was handled with about as much grace as it could have been. One wonders whether, in the face of the rise of China, the Americans may follow a different and far more dangerous path. Could it be that a country that considers itself to be the world's greatest democracy might end up so shocked and embittered by their decline that they end up following a demagogue? If this is the reaction of the right in America to the relatively minor changes that have been proposed by Obama, then one wonders whether in fact we are seeing a nascent Fascist movement emerging.

The Roman Republic -upon which the United States is explicitly modelled- fell after 482 years as the result of demagoguery and the Imperial subversion of Caesar. Those in America who are determined to give such passion to their lies are quite capable of subverting the American Republic too.

The price of Freedom remains eternal vigilance- but sometimes the enemy can be in oneself. If the political agenda in the USA continues to be set by the birthers and the likes of Rush Limbaugh, then the future of the US could be grim indeed.
Labels:

Comments

Dilettante said…
A very interesting article - my only bone of contention is that none of what you describe is "Fascism" - it is simply bigotry and hatred. Fascism is a specific political ideology with tenets that the vast bulk of any given group won't actually know, and most of the US right would loathe (it being all statist). Small bone to pick, but my university years have given me a strong reflex against the misuse of that word.
5:31 pm
Unknown said…
My bone of contention is that it completely misunderstands American history and politics.

In America, if you weren't born an American then you can't be president, simple as.

McCain was born in Panama to American parents. Some think he didn't have the right.

Obama was born in Hawaii to one American parent. If he wasn't born in Hawaii then his link to America, and legitimacy, would be severely questioned.

The birthers want to keep the constitution strong.

And I'm an independent.
8:53 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...
Post a Comment
Read more

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...
20 comments
Read more

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...
14 comments
Read more