Skip to main content

FPTP- RIP?

A long night at the count for Gordon, where Malcolm Bruce was able to hold his seat in fine style: a tribute to a fine local MP. Equally Sir Robert Smith held West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine in the face of a determined challenge.

However, across the country, though the people may have spoken, what they are saying has been ignored.

The Liberal Democrats won many thousand more votes than last time, but we must content ourselves with a smaller Parliamentary representation. The defence of the First Past the Post electoral system is that is is supposed to deliver more stable governments, albeit at the expense of the democratic will. Now, it is difficult to establish what should happen. The fact is that the country must now face considerable uncertainty in the face of such a distorted result. The difference between the Liberal Democrats holding 55 seats and holding more than 70 seats is a bare few hundred votes.

This makes a farce of our democracy. Without electoral reform, Britain can no longer claim that its government reflects the will of the people in anything more than an approximation. Both Mr. Cameron and Mr. Brown should now reflect on the new reality. It is clear that Labour can not hold on to power- and any attempt to do so would lead to disaster. Mr. Cameron has more votes and -barely- more seats. He has a mandate, however imperfectly, to try to form a government. In the face of the the economic crisis, David Cameron must now take on the responsibility to form a government in the national interest.

If David Cameron does want to form a stable government, he must now consider not just the policies the UK needs to tackle the economic crisis, but also the political crisis: and that must include recognition that the electoral system does not reflect how people voted: it has distorted it.

Comments

Newmania said…
Must be disappointing .Cheer up When Jeremy Thorpe traded his pocketful of baubles with Heath the Liberals were nothing .Now even with this poor showing they are likely to hold the balance of power often .The long term future is , as I think sensible people must accept , reform of some sort.

Who knows is it possible the Lib Dems might allow that other people have a view ? ....On the other hand if the Party defrauds the people now at this time by subterfuge with New Labour then it would not be forgiven .All those who oppose collectivism in all its pinky and red guises would know what the Liberals stood for which is what we always said it was ...Labour
Kyle Le Huray said…
I'm anxious about us joining with the Cons, but Labour have had years to sort out the voting system and have avoided true democracy until it became neccessary for them to stay in power. Labour are finished, let's just hope that the we aren't seen as "mini-conservatives" at the next election. Even worse - let's hope that the Tories don't backstab us and point the finger when their plans start to go horribly wrong.
Newmania said…
I actually think that both Parties have a lot to gain for being seen to cooperate now
Conservatives have to get right back into the mainstream there is still far to much "No-one likes us and we don`t care ".

Liberals will be seen as safe pair of hands and vitally not simply as part of the so called "Progressive alliance ".
Anonymous said…
Lib Dems should embrace this opportunity and Pushing for Proportional Representation now could be bad for Lib Dems a blog: http://wp.me/pRHY4-C
Tim Hedges said…
'The defence of the First Past the Post electoral system is that is is supposed to deliver more stable governments, albeit at the expense of the democratic will.'

Puh-lease. Remember Helmut Kohl? voted out by his constituents after a financial scandal. When they woke up next morning he was still there, put back on the Party List system.

Look at what is going on now: after we have voted the Political Class sort out the policies they want (not what we want). You might have voted LibDem because of opposition to Trident only to find it's back on the agenda on Monday.

You think that's democratic? Give me FPTP any day.
Anonymous said…
"Barely" more seats? He has 50 more seats. That's a good 20% more.

The only reason Cameron is not in Downing Street this morning is because Gordon Brown, in the face of the most recent relevant precedent (1974 not in fact being a precedent for the current situation) has not admitted the country hates his guts and resigned.

Congratulations on your results in Scotland. And in Cheltenham, for the matter of that - although it wasn't unexpected to anyone who knows anything about Cheltenham!

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo