Skip to main content

Its the Economy...stupid

Now the air truly is dark with chickens coming home to roost for Gordon Brown.

It is now clear that the Governor of the Bank of England is going to be writing a lot of letters explaining how he has missed the inflation target. The newspapers are full of columns on the coming economic disaster. The dreaded "R word" - recession- is now being coupled with inflation and comparisons are being drawn with the stagflation decade of the 1970s.

Thus, the fact that many comparisons are being made between Gordon Brown today and the Major government after 1995, is even worse for Gordon Brown than it appears- Major, after all was presiding over a substantial improvement in the economy, ironically enough largely caused by the collapse of the long term Conservative strategy of targeting a stable currency rate for Sterling against the D-Mark, rather than targeting inflation directly.

Inflation targeting is now facing its first serious test- a challenge for the Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King- but equally a test of the commitment of the government to maintain the independence of the Central Bank. There will be growing temptation to intervene.

However, such temptation rests on the fact that Gordan Brown promised "an end to boom and bust". What he really meant was and end to bust, of course, since no government would try to end a boom, unless they were prepared to commit political suicide. Unfortunately for Mr. Brown, the bust seems to be well underway, and there is now precious little he can do about it.

If division was poisonous for John Major's Conservatives in bad times, how much worse will the fall of Labour be, in the face of the first downturn in a decade and a half, and a downturn that could well turn out to be severe and prolonged?

In six months all of Mr. Brown's hopes have turned to ash- yet the voters remain fickle. The Conservatives may be growing in confidence, but there is precious little trust on offer from a cynical and fearful electorate. The re-emergence of the hunting ban as a political football- the sub-text being, of course that David Cameron and his cronies are pro-hunting toffs- is a rather crude attempt by the Labour spin machine to fight back.

However- as the economic gloom continues to grow, Gordon Brown seems set to be hoisted by his own petard- the economy, of which he has been the steward throughout the Labour government, will be what he is judged on- and the electorate seems set to convict.

Comments

Newmania said…
Now I quite like that post.

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...