Skip to main content

Technophobe

The political air has been filled with the braying of Tory triumphalists since last Thursday, and to be fair it is probably their best result for years, even decades. The rush to bury the Lib Dems is, however, somewhat premature. The mixed results that the Lib Dems have had mask the fact that while in some areas, like Islington and Winchester (OK, a local factor there, we all know) , in several other places, like Brent, we did unexpectedly well, and ultimately the party has ended up gaining councils. Also the way in which the Tories are so keen to bury Menzies Campbell I, personally, find rather telling. The fact is that the attempts to paint Ming as "too old" are a function of the fact that their leader is "too young", and with several unexplained and questionable episodes in his recent past. Over the weekend a senior journalist I know suggested a level of scandal about various senior Conservatives that I do not feel at liberty to repeat, but which, if true and if public, would be very serious.

What concerns me is that such figures can lay themselves open, by their behaviour, to astonishing blackmail. I have often wondered about John Major. His abject failure to insist on the resignation of his scandal-hit ministers until it was far to late was, at the time, taken as a sign of his essential decency (or ineptitude). With the hindsight of the knowledge of his own extra marital affair, I have wondered if, in fact, he may have been susceptible to pressure. Some powerful people may have knowledge of scandalous behaviour by politicians which they may not make public, but use for a much darker game of blackmail. Perhaps that is happening now too. Certainly I am not the only one to think that the flush of Labour scandals which are all of various vintages, but which have all been revealed at the same time, is not coincidental, but planned. Concealment, for a while, may prove the most valuable way for a journalist to report a scandal, and their proprietor to develop more influence, or profit.

All in all, my feeling is that scandal flourishes in the isolated and isolating political culture that we have created. Too many politicians have become a class apart- with no other discernible skill save that of climbing the greasy pole. There are good people in all parties, yest the system does not recognize this, preferring to dwell on the point scoring, rather than real debate. The dumbing down of political debate may have reached the point that the only thing we know about a political figure is their presumed sexual proclivities. This is a sordid decadence. As we debate the future of our political system, I would hate to have our country take the wrong path because we were too stupid to recognize the right one. Blair and Cameron seem to have come out of the same mould of shiny, public school politician- but I see no substance in either. Perhaps the voters are prepared to give Cameron the benefit of the doubt at present. However there is a great deal of doubt about him and his team- and we should remind people that substance is the essence of politics.

I am now en route to Japan, and have now discovered the utter incompatibility of all my techie stuff- from mobile to BlackBerry- with Japanese protocols, so I suspect blogging will be quite sparse over the next couple of weeks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post Truth and Justice

The past decade has seen the rise of so-called "post truth" politics.  Instead of mere misrepresentation of facts to serve an argument, political figures began to put forward arguments which denied easily provable facts, and then blustered and browbeat those who pointed out the lie.  The political class was able to get away with "post truth" positions because the infrastructure that reported their activity has been suborned directly into the process. In short, the media abandoned long-cherished traditions of objectivity and began a slow slide into undeclared bias and partisanship.  The "fourth estate" was always a key piece of how democratic societies worked, since the press, and later the broadcast media could shape opinion by the way they reported on the political process. As a result there has never been a golden age of objective media, but nevertheless individual reporters acquired better or worse reputations for the quality of their reporting and

We need to talk about UK corruption

After a long hiatus, mostly to do with indolence and partly to do with the general election campaign, I feel compelled to take up the metaphorical pen and make a few comments on where I see the situation of the UK in the aftermath of the "Brexit election". OK, so we lost.  We can blame many reasons, though fundamentally the Conservatives refused to make the mistakes of 2017 and Labour and especially the Liberal Democrats made every mistake that could be made.  Indeed the biggest mistake of all was allowing Johnson to hold the election at all, when another six months would probably have eaten the Conservative Party alive.  It was Jo Swinson's first, but perhaps most critical, mistake to make, and from it came all the others.  The flow of defectors and money persuaded the Liberal Democrat bunker that an election could only be better for the Lib Dems, and as far as votes were concerned, the party did indeed increase its vote by 1.3 million.   BUT, and it really is the bi

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo