Skip to main content

IS Football as fixed as cricket?

I watched the football match between the Republic of Ireland and Estonia last Friday. 

As the Hungarian referee made decision after decision that favoured the Irish visitors, it was firstly frustrating, then infuriating, then contemptible.

I am not the only one who believes that the match we saw last Friday was not fairly refereed.


There is then the question of why Estonia faced this biased match? Personally I do not think that UEFA or FIFA would have decided that Ireland deserved a measure of recompense for the Hand of Gaul, although Armenia have formally complained that they suffered similar bias when they played Ireland.

I do think it is possible that Football may be suffering from the same kind of problem as Cricket.

Ireland is a betting mad nation, and huge wagers are staked whenever the Republic plays.

I am no expert, but to my eye, the quality of refereeing was so poor that it is hard to admit of an excuse that does not involve skulduggery. We already know that the international football administration shows signs of profound corruption. Is it too much of a stretch to suggest that if a fish rots from the head, might the very game of football too be facing a genuine crisis?

The problem is with Sepp Blatter in charge, who is widely believed to have fostered a culture of corruption across FIFA, it is hard to believe that any clean investigation could be launched. The cynicism in the round ball game remains hard faced and the morals of the game have been reduced to a matter of gamesmanship and money.

The team that beat Serbia 3-0 away could certainly have lost to Ireland 4-0 at home, but the two red cards and the exclusion of three key Estonian players for the return match tomorrow certainly made the process of Irish qualification a whole lot easier.

Suspiciously so, you might say.


UPDATE: After seeing such a different match in Dublin, which ended in a 1-1 draw, I am now pretty firmly convinced that the match in Tallinn was fixed. Unless football can clean its Augean stables, I don't think I will be following it any further. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for the Barbarians

What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum? The barbarians are due here today. Why isn’t anything going on in the senate? Why are the senators sitting there without legislating? Because the barbarians are coming today. What’s the point of senators making laws now? Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating. Why did our emperor get up so early, and why is he sitting enthroned at the city’s main gate, in state, wearing the crown? Because the barbarians are coming today and the emperor’s waiting to receive their leader. He’s even got a scroll to give him, loaded with titles, with imposing names. Why have our two consuls and praetors come out today wearing their embroidered, their scarlet togas? Why have they put on bracelets with so many amethysts, rings sparkling with magnificent emeralds? Why are they carrying elegant canes beautifully worked in silver and gold? Because the barbarians are coming today and things like that dazzle the barbarians. Why don’t our distingui...
Post a Comment
Read more

Liberal Democrats v Conservatives: the battle in the blogosphere

It is probably fair to say that the advent of Nick Clegg, the new leader of the Liberal Democrats, has not been greeted with unalloyed joy by our Conservative opponents. Indeed, it would hardly be wrong to say that the past few weeks has seen some "pretty robust" debate between Conservative and Liberal Democrat bloggers. Even the Queen Mum of blogging, the generally genial Iain Dale seems to have been featuring as many stories as he can to try to show Liberal Democrats in as poor a light as possible. Neither, to be fair, has the traffic been all one way: I have "fisked' Mr. Cameron's rather half-baked proposals on health, and attacked several of the Conservative positions that have emerged from the fog of their policy making process. Most Liberal Democrats have attacked the Conservatives probably with more vigour even than the distrusted, discredited Labour government. So what lies behind this sharper debate, this emerging war in the blogosphere? Partly- in my ...
20 comments
Read more

Lib Dem v. Tory (Round 2)

The Liberal Democrats stand for a distinct political ideology. It is an ideology built around both socially and economically liberal precepts. In as far as our ruling Labour government can be said to have an ideology at all, it coincides with Liberalism only incidentally. Labour stands for pragmatism, and where it does not there is still a core of values that are collectivist and not individual. Sometimes people are prepared to claim the moral high ground for policies of social solidarity and redistribution of wealth. Liberals may argue in favour of equality of opportunity, we can not argue in favour- as Socialists do- of "and equal society". The reason is simple: Socialism does not work. If one places equality above freedom, then eventually we get tyranny. This is why, while we may argue in favour of a more equal society as being a stronger society, the tools that we may use to gain -in our view- socially desirable outcomes must rest upon freedom above all else. As PJ O'...
14 comments
Read more