Skip to main content

Estonian Egalitarianism (= success)

One of the most attractive features of Estonian society is the complete lack of anything that could be described as social hierarchy. Even in countries smaller than Estonia a great deal of pomp is given to the political leaders- large numbers of bodyguards, police outriders on motorcades, government jets and all the toys of the powerful. In Estonia the ministers fly commercial and the level of security is minimally discreet.

Talking last night to a friend who is the head of one of the largest local banks, he remarked on the fact that Estonians do not feel constrained by different levels of wealth- money is not a social barrier. There are creative people who have very little money, but they may still socialize with business leaders, indeed artists or writers have their own clubs, and an invitation to visit is quite prized- and is not a function of price in the slightest.

I suppose this egalitarianism is a function of the long periods when Estonians were an undifferentiated mass of peasantry, and even when some were able to become freeholders or even move into the professional classes in the 19th century, they kept their roots in the land. Of course the occupation too undermined the political power of the wealthy, mostly by stealing most things of value. 

Even still, the open access that Estonians have to their political and economic leaders is appealing. I saw the Prime Minister out practicing his skiing before the snows come- though I was not aware he injured himself. 

This egalitarianism is a very stubborn root, and clearly is a part of Estonian political culture that nurtures the highest democratic values. Whether it comes from Lutheranism, from education or indeed from "peasant values", it is one reason why corruption is generally held in check. The kind of blatant theft that is obvious in Russia could not be tolerated in Estonia. Though, doubtless there are plenty of self-serving and venial politicians in the Estonian political class- the vast majority are not. Where a political figure comes under question, there is a clear question of disgrace and shame: not, most assuredly the case in many other countries.

So Estonians are educated, open minded and egalitarian. It certainly helps explain the radicalism of Estonian Liberalism- and its electoral success.

After I penned this article I noticed the latest piece from the excellent Eastern Approaches blog from The Economist. 


Jüri Saar said…
Just because something takes a different form doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I urge you took look more carefuly at how Estonians talk and socialize with the local Russians. This also seems to have unfortunate implications for the liberalization of immigration policy and the ability to keep younger Estonians expecting more variety for leaving for greener pastures.
Cicero said…
Fair point, I think that Estonians do respond differently to Russians, and also to me, as another non-Estonian, but I don't think that changes how they interact with one another. So while I think you have a point that Estonian society is not notably diverse, it IS notably anti-hierarchy, and that is really the point I am making. Compared to Lithuania, which is quite a hierarchical country,built on Catholic rather than Protestant principles, Estonia has a pretty small emigration. I think those two issue are closely linked. At least in Estonia the young still play a big role in society, even if that role is not as big as it was, say 20 year ago. In Lithuania the emigration is more like 30% than 5%, because the younger generation do not feel that they can control their own destiny, the way young Estonians can and largely do.

Popular posts from this blog

Concert and Blues

Tallinn is full tonight... Big concerts on at the Song field The Weeknd and Bonnie Tyler (!). The place is buzzing and some sixty thousand concert goers have booked every bed for thirty miles around Tallinn. It should be a busy high summer, but it isn´t. Tourism is down sharply overall. Only 70 cruise ships calling this season, versus over 300 before Ukraine. Since no one goes to St Pete, demand has fallen, and of course people think that Estonia is not safe. We are tired. The economy is still under big pressure, and the fall of tourism is a significant part of that. The credit rating for Estonia has been downgraded as the government struggles with spending. The summer has been a little gloomy, and soon the long and slow autumn will drift into the dark of the year. Yesterday I met with more refugees: the usual horrible stories, the usual tears. I try to make myself immune, but I can´t. These people are wounded in spirit, carrying their grief in a terrible cradling. I try to project hop

Media misdirection

In the small print of the UK budget we find that the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the British Finance Minister) has allocated a further 15 billion Pounds to the funding for the UK track and trace system. This means that the cost of the UK´s track and trace system is now 37 billion Pounds.  That is approximately €43 billion or US$51 billion, which is to say that it is amount of money greater than the national GDP of over 110 countries, or if you prefer, it is roughly the same number as the combined GDP of the 34 smallest economies of the planet.  As at December 2020, 70% of the contracts for the track and trace system were awarded by the Conservative government without a competitive tender being made . The program is overseen by Dido Harding , who is not only a Conservative Life Peer, but the wife of a Conservative MP, John Penrose, and a contemporary of David Cameron and Boris Johnson at Oxford. Many of these untendered contracts have been given to companies that seem to have no notewo

KamiKwasi brings an end to the illusion of Tory economic competence

After a long time, Politics seems to be getting interesting again, so I thought it might be time to restart my blog. With regard to this weeks mini budget, as with all budgets, there are two aspects: the economic and the political. The economic rationale for this package is questionable at best. The problems of the UK economy are structural. Productivity and investment are weak, infrastructure is under-invested and decaying. Small businesses are going to the wall and despite entrepreneurship being relatively strong in Britain, self-employment is increasingly unattractive. Red tape since Brexit has led to a significant fall in exports and the damage has been disproportionately on small businesses. Literally none of these problems are being addressed by this package. Even if the package were to stimulate some kind of short term consumption-led growth boom, this is unlikely to be sustainable, not least because what is being added on the fiscal side will be need to be offset, to a great de